M ore than half a century ago, two pivotal reviews 1,2 showed that while the fossil history of angiosperms "is extra ordinarily and increasingly well documented in postEarly Cretaceous sedimentsâŠno bona fide angiosperm remains, either megafossil or microfossil, have yet been described from rocks older than Early Cretaceous" 1 . Here, we revisit this conclusion and assess the extent to which the situation has changed, given a substantial increase in the quantity and quality of palaeobotanical data and an increasing number of reports of angiosperms from older rocks.Since the key reviews of the 1960s, great progress has been made in understanding the major patterns in the angiosperm fossil record [3][4][5] . There have also been significant advances in understand ing evolutionary relationships within the angiosperm clade-espe cially in using DNA sequences from living plants to reconstruct phylogenetic patterns 6 . Widely accepted hypotheses indicate that more than 99% of angiosperm species occur in three major clades (eudicots, monocots, (eu)magnoliids), which are embed ded in a paraphyletic assemblage of other early diverging lineages that includes Amborellales, Austrobaileyales, Ceratophyllales, Chloranthales and Nymphaeales [6][7][8] . More controversial are esti mates of the age of the most recent common ancestor of extant angiosperms based on molecular clock techniques, and hypotheses of the phylogenetic position of angiosperms in relation to other seed plant lineages. As molecular clock estimates are most often calibrated using palaeontological data, and because the closest rela tives to angiosperms are almost certainly extinct groups, fossils are integral to progress in both of these areas.Building on important advances made during the 1970s preserved as compressions or impressions from Early Cretaceous strata [11][12][13] . Taken together, these discoveries and their sequence of appearance in the fossil record are broadly consistent with the patterns of relation ships established among extant angiosperms using molecular data, and the associated patterns of character evo lution. All of the reproductive structures recognized so far from Early Cretaceous sediments are either extinct forms, apparently with no close relatives among living angiosperms, or are related to Austrobaileyales, Chloranthales, Nymphaeales, various groups of eumagnoliids, or early branches of eudicots or monocots (Fig. 1, for references see refs 10 and 14). Preservation of fine structural details in some of these Early Cretaceous fossils further confirms their inferred relation ship with extant lineages that are hypothesized to have diverged at an early stage in angiosperm diversification based on molecular phylogenetics 15 . The improved angiosperm fossil record from the Cretaceous has facilitated the calibration of molecular clock age estimates for various angiosperm clades and for the age of angiosperms as a whole [16][17][18][19][20][21] . While current techniques remain susceptible to prob lems resulting from significantly different ...