2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the impact of childhood adversities on cognitive deficits in psychosis: An exploratory analysis

Abstract: Abuse and neglect at periods when children spend substantial time in their families affect cognitive functioning, and hence aggravate dysfunction in psychosis. Results support the neurodevelopmental perspective on psychosis and the diagnostic value of type and timing of ACE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar deficits in working memory and inhibitory control are noted in human studies (Table 4; although see Feeney et al, 2013), with some indication that selective attention may also be impaired in adults reporting chronic exposure to juvenile stressors (e.g. Schalinski et al, 2017; Viola et al, 2013, although this latter study was complicated by simultaneous treatment for crack cocaine use). As discussed in section 3.2, these facets of executive function are dependent on PFC function.…”
Section: Impact Of Chronic Juvenile Stress On Prefrontal Cortex Ansupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar deficits in working memory and inhibitory control are noted in human studies (Table 4; although see Feeney et al, 2013), with some indication that selective attention may also be impaired in adults reporting chronic exposure to juvenile stressors (e.g. Schalinski et al, 2017; Viola et al, 2013, although this latter study was complicated by simultaneous treatment for crack cocaine use). As discussed in section 3.2, these facets of executive function are dependent on PFC function.…”
Section: Impact Of Chronic Juvenile Stress On Prefrontal Cortex Ansupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In addition, the majority of preclinical studies assessing the effects of pre- and adolescent stress exposure on later executive function and reward processing are conducted using social-based stressors. Furthermore, human studies rarely either distinguish the different types of stressors experienced by participants or establish the precise age of stress exposure (Tables 2 & 4; but see Schalinski et al, 2017). Additional confounds arise from differences between preclinical and clinical studies in the type of reward used to assess changes in reward processing following juvenile exposure to chronic stress, with animal studies primarily focusing on responses to drugs of abuse, whereas monetary rewards have typically been used for humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this meta‐analysis examined only studies of nonsocial cognition, and did not explore whether different types of adversity or the timing of adversity (e.g., neglect vs. trauma, early vs. late childhood) has differential effects on cognition in schizophrenia. Notably, findings from recent studies suggest that social cognitive impairment is more related to neglect than other types of adversity.…”
Section: Recent Developments and Future Directions For Research On Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional analytic techniques, such as multiple regression, are not suitable because of marked collinearity in the degree of exposure to specific types of maltreatment at adjacent ages. Instead, we identified the most important cross-validated "predictors" associated with global network measures using random forest regression with conditional inference trees (RFR-CIT) (cforest in R package party), an artificial intelligence machine learning strategy that is highly resistant to collinearity, which we have used in an expanding series of sensitive period studies (Khan et al, 2015;Pechtel, Lyons-Ruth, Anderson, & Teicher, 2014;Schalinski, Breinlinger, Hirt, Teicher, Odenwald, & Rockstroh, 2017;Schalinski, Teicher, Carolus, & Rockstroh, 2018;Schalinski, Teicher, Nischk, Hinderer, Muller, & Rockstroh, 2016;Teicher, et al, 2018;Tomoda, Navalta, Polcari, Sadato, & Teicher, 2009a;Tomoda et al, 2012). Random forest regression predicts outcome by creating a forest of different decision trees with each tree generated from a different subset of the data and constrained in the number of predictors that can be considered at each branch point (Breiman, 2001).…”
Section: Identification Of Sensitive Exposure Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%