2016
DOI: 10.1080/03639045.2016.1188108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the design space for freeze-dried orodispersible tablets with meloxicam

Abstract: From the generated design space, an optimal formulation was obtained and the results validated the experimental design. The QbD approach was an efficient manner of understanding formulation and process parameters at the freeze-dried orodispersible tablets preparation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that one input was qualitative (the type of extragranular diluent), two design spaces were generated, one for each variable. The green area represents the design space and each point from this area predicts, with a low probability of failure under 1 %, a possible hydrophilic matrix formulation that would possess the described CQAs (20). The dotted frame inside the design space is the design space hypercube, which defines the proven acceptable range (PAR).…”
Section: Design Space and Formulation Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that one input was qualitative (the type of extragranular diluent), two design spaces were generated, one for each variable. The green area represents the design space and each point from this area predicts, with a low probability of failure under 1 %, a possible hydrophilic matrix formulation that would possess the described CQAs (20). The dotted frame inside the design space is the design space hypercube, which defines the proven acceptable range (PAR).…”
Section: Design Space and Formulation Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This acceptable range is defined by a design space hypercube, which represents the largest possible regular hypercube that can be inserted into the irregular design space and shows the volume in which all factor combinations can be used without compromising the product's CQAs (19). After the determination of the design space and PAR, the optimal formulations were determined by defining combinations of factor values that predict a result as close as possible to the target values of all responses (20).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of fit of a model is given by the value of R 2 and represents the variation of the response explained by the model. Q 2 represents the goodness of prediction and reveals how well the model can predict new experiments [30]. Model validity provides insights regarding the model error, while reproducibility (pure error) evaluates the variation of response under identical conditions compared to its total variation.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DoE is also useful to identify the individual and interacting factors. Using response surface, methodology may lead to the development of Design Space (DS), which assure the quality of the desired product and can be defined for both the formulation and process parameters [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the variables that have an impact on CQAs are interconnected; therefore, their study using design of experiments (DoEs) was useful to assess and predict both their individual and interacting effects. Statistical calculations of the multifactorial relationships with the use of response surface methodology lead to the development of a design space, meaning a domain of input variables, which guarantee the delivery of a product with the required characteristics 5,7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%