Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore

Abstract

BackgroundA cross-sectional study to ascertain what the Singapore population would regard as material risk in the anaesthesia consent-taking process and identify demographic factors that predict patient preferences in medical decision-making to tailor a more patient-centered informed consent.MethodsA survey was performed involving patients 21 years old and above who attended the pre-operative evaluation clinic over a 1-month period in Singapore General Hospital. Questionnaires were administered to assess patients’ perception of material risks, by trained interviewers. Patients’ demographics were obtained. Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used. Statistical significance was taken at p < 0.05.ResultsFour hundred fourteen patients were eligible of which 26 refused to participate and 24 were excluded due to language barrier. 364 patients were recruited. A higher level of education (p < 0.007), being employed (p < 0.046) and younger age group (p < 0.003) are factors identified in patients who wanted greater participation in medical decisions. Gender, marital status, type of surgery, and previous surgical history did not affect their level of participation. The complications most patients knew about were Nausea (64.8%), Drowsiness (62.4%) and Surgical Wound Pain (58.8%). Patients ranked Heart Attack (59.3%), Death (53.8%) and Stroke (52.7%) as the most significant risks that they wanted to be informed about in greater detail.Most patients wanted to make a joint decision with the anaesthetist (52.2%), instead of letting the doctor decide (37.1%) or deciding for themselves (10.7%). Discussion with the anaesthetist (61.3%) is the preferred medium of communication compared to reading a pamphlet (23.4%) or watching a video (15.4%).ConclusionAge and educational level can influence medical decision-making. Despite the digital age, most patients still prefer a clinic consult instead of audio-visual multimedia for pre-operative anaesthetic counselling. The local population appears to place greater importance on rare but serious complications compared to common complications. This illustrates the need to contextualize information provided during informed consent to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How do Singapore patients view post-anaesthesia adverse outcomes? A single-centre willingness-to-pay study

“…Numerous studies have suggested that demographic factors, such as ethnicity, age and gender, influenced an individual's perception of an adverse outcome. (16) Our study identified various subgroups with more concerns for certain adverse outcomes: younger patients (orodental trauma); government-subsidised patients (sore throat); previous anaesthesia experience (sore throat); women (nausea); previous post-anaesthesia adverse outcomes (sore throat); and less than six years of education (nausea and somnolence). However, the statistically significant differences in ranking did not translate into differences in terms of patients' willingness to pay.…”

“…(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) However, research thus far has largely been centred on the Western population, limiting the transferability of results to the Singapore population, where differences in culture, socioeconomics and healthcare structure have an undeniable influence on patient's perspectives, expectations of care and health-seeking behaviour. (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) Furthermore, significant difference exists between the willingness-to-pay (WTP) spending habits between Asians and Westerners. Asians are more willing to pay to avoid negative emotions but less willing to do so to experience positive emotions, while Western populations have reported converse results.…”

Development of the Combined Assessment of Risk Encountered in Surgery (CARES) surgical risk calculator for prediction of postsurgical mortality and need for intensive care unit admission risk: a single-center retrospective study

“…The prediction of postsurgical 30-day mortality risk is an important clinical outcome that is of interest to both surgeons and patients and therefore aids in shared decision making. 26 Thirty-day all-cause postoperative mortality is a widely accepted, valid and relevant outcome measure of surgical care. 27 For this study, the postoperative mortality data were synced with the National Registry of Death data, ensuring the integrity and completeness of the data.…”

What should I tell my patient? Disclosure in anaesthesiology: difficulties, requirements, guidelines and suggestions

“…16 Patients prefer this decision-making model compared with, for example, having to decide on their own, or the anaesthesiologist paternalistically deciding for them. 17 The HPCSA booklets on ethical conduct have the general title 'Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in the Healthcare Professions' . Guidelines normally have a somewhat lower hierarchical status than laws in that they are not normally legally enforceable.…”