2007
DOI: 10.1177/1524838007303194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Patterns of Genital Injury From Sexual Assault

Abstract: The forensic examination following rape has two primary purposes: to provide health care and to collect evidence. Physical injuries need treatment so that they heal without adverse consequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly because epithelial layers can become ulcerated because of sexually transmitted infections and can be damaged by inflammations such as those caused by common infections like yeast (candidiasis) 6 and herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) 7 . Also, intercourse itself may damage this layer, as epithelial microabrasions were detected in 60% of women following consensual intercourse 8, 9 . The damaged areas provide open access to the sub-epithelial structures where HIV-1 cell targets predominantly reside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly because epithelial layers can become ulcerated because of sexually transmitted infections and can be damaged by inflammations such as those caused by common infections like yeast (candidiasis) 6 and herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) 7 . Also, intercourse itself may damage this layer, as epithelial microabrasions were detected in 60% of women following consensual intercourse 8, 9 . The damaged areas provide open access to the sub-epithelial structures where HIV-1 cell targets predominantly reside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genital injury after consented sex is rare, estimated in about 5–6% of cases, and more likely to occur in postmenopausal women 87–89 . All studies agree that genital injury after non-consensual sexual intercourse is significantly higher compared to consented sex, but incidence of injury vary depending on the method used to determine it 87, 90 . Gross visualization includes only bruising, abrasions and lacerations as injuries and is seen in 40% of reported cases, while inspection by colposcopy, which includes “subjective” injuries such as swelling and redness, results in up to 87% incidence 87, 90 .…”
Section: Biological Implications Of Sexual Assault and Female Genitalmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…All studies agree that genital injury after non-consensual sexual intercourse is significantly higher compared to consented sex, but incidence of injury vary depending on the method used to determine it 87, 90 . Gross visualization includes only bruising, abrasions and lacerations as injuries and is seen in 40% of reported cases, while inspection by colposcopy, which includes “subjective” injuries such as swelling and redness, results in up to 87% incidence 87, 90 . Presence of “subjective” injuries in 87–92% of victims within 48 hours after sexual assault 39 appears of extreme relevance as a risk factor for HIV acquisition, since it results in active inflammation and the increased presence of HIV-target cells at the site of exposure.…”
Section: Biological Implications Of Sexual Assault and Female Genitalmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Swelling is edematous or transient engorgement of tissues. 49 However, in the past 30 years, scientist and clinicians from more than a dozen countries as diverse as Nigeria, Brazil, Australia, and China 6,29,30,43,50-69 have used a variety of typologies other than TEARS to classify injuries related to consensual sexual intercourse as well as those associated with IPV and SV. Clearly there is a need to classify genital and non-genital injuries related to violence, but we could find no consensus in the literature with respect to the best approach that will serve clinicians and scientists alike.…”
Section: Current Status Of Injury Classification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While their terminology is slightly different, both essentially use the TEARS system to describe injury type. Neither provides a specific definition for each injury type; the definition of the terms in TEARS seems to first appear in the work published by Sommers et al 29,49 Several authors include physical symptoms of injury, such as bleeding, 33,72,73 tenderness, 46,55 _ENREF_55 and pain 46,51 _ENREF_51 in their typologies, but such inclusion is unusual.…”
Section: Current Status Of Injury Classification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%