2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining IOCG signatures through compositional data analysis: A case study of lithogeochemical zoning from the Olympic Dam deposit, South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For analyses on the nanoSIMS 50L, the seven detectors were carefully tuned to the desired isotopes and grains of interest were presputtered, then mapped (50 × 50 µm raster area, 50 pA ion current, D1 = 2, ES = 2, AS = 0, 512 × 512 pixels (px), 3 planes, 5 ms/px, effective beam diameter ≈ 400 nm). Following this round of mapping, the instrument was retuned to six different isotopes and one redundant isotope, usually 54 Fe (for comparison and alignment between runs), and the grains were mapped a second time (50 × 50 µm raster area, 250 pA ion current, D1 = 2, ES = 2, AS = 0, 512 × 512 px, 5 or 6 planes, 5 ms/px, effective beam diameter ≈ 700 nm). A similar procedure was used for the nanoSIMS 50, although most grains were mapped only once (50 x 50 µm raster area, 2 pA ion current, D1 = 2, ES = 2, AS = 2, 512 × 512 px, 1-3 planes, 15 ms/px, egun on, effective beam diameter ≈ 400 nm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For analyses on the nanoSIMS 50L, the seven detectors were carefully tuned to the desired isotopes and grains of interest were presputtered, then mapped (50 × 50 µm raster area, 50 pA ion current, D1 = 2, ES = 2, AS = 0, 512 × 512 pixels (px), 3 planes, 5 ms/px, effective beam diameter ≈ 400 nm). Following this round of mapping, the instrument was retuned to six different isotopes and one redundant isotope, usually 54 Fe (for comparison and alignment between runs), and the grains were mapped a second time (50 × 50 µm raster area, 250 pA ion current, D1 = 2, ES = 2, AS = 0, 512 × 512 px, 5 or 6 planes, 5 ms/px, effective beam diameter ≈ 700 nm). A similar procedure was used for the nanoSIMS 50, although most grains were mapped only once (50 x 50 µm raster area, 2 pA ion current, D1 = 2, ES = 2, AS = 2, 512 × 512 px, 1-3 planes, 15 ms/px, egun on, effective beam diameter ≈ 400 nm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying and characterizing all components within ore-forming hydrothermal fluids may aid in reconstructing ore formation and alteration profiles, and for defining the geochemical signature of the deposit [54]. To the metallurgist, greater interest lies in the ability of nanoSIMS to track trace amounts of potentially economic elements, including Co, Ni, V, In, and REE during various stages of ore processing.…”
Section: Penalty Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hematite from the ore breccias, whether within clasts or the matrix, displays a variety of textures and geochemical signatures but the earliest hematite is oscillatory-and sectorial-zoned with respect to U, W, Sn and Mo [54]. This 'granitophile signature' is present throughout the strike and depth of the orebody and is clearly recognized from multivariate statistical analysis of a large lithogeochemical dataset [55]. Such hematite can also be reliable and accurately dated [46].…”
Section: Geological Background and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous to the clan of IOCG systems, which are known to display elevated concentrations of many elements (Groves et al 2010), the manifestation of the Acropolis IOCG signature is multi-element ( Figure 5). The U-W-Sn-Mo signature in hematite at Olympic Dam (Verdugo-Ihl et al, 2017) is recognised in geochemical studies as a distinct W-Mo-Sn subset besides the dominant Fe, Cu, Au association in the IOCG signature obtained from PCA analysis (Dmitrijeva et al, 2019). Although Acropolis is deficient in terms of Au (> 70% of values are below the minimum detection limit) and contains geochemically anomalous, but low concentrations of Cu, it demonstrates a mineralisation signature analogous to that at Olympic Dam, with high loadings of W, Sn, Sb, U, Th and REE (Cluster 3), albeit at trace concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%