2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00142-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Investment Additionality for CDM projects—practical approaches

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is widespread unwillingness to determine additionality on the basis of predefined quantitative thresholds (e.g. for internal rate of return, see Greiner and Michaelowa 2003), qualitative methods are likely to prevail. These however risk to be applied in an arbitrary way.…”
Section: Additionality Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is widespread unwillingness to determine additionality on the basis of predefined quantitative thresholds (e.g. for internal rate of return, see Greiner and Michaelowa 2003), qualitative methods are likely to prevail. These however risk to be applied in an arbitrary way.…”
Section: Additionality Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies the needs of some form of an additionality test that checks whether the adaptation would have happened anyhow. This could use tests like those under mitigation where the activity needs to be a documented money loser or something not already implemented in the region, as mentioned by Greiner and Michaelowa [80]. However, it may be desirable to use already implemented practices if they improve adaptation in a sub-region or among select parties where they are not now used.…”
Section: Additionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the interpretation of the second paragraph which is more controversial. One group of experts interprets additionality as environmental additionality only, while the other group contends that environmental additionality is a necessary but not a sufficient condition, the additionality of the project itself (investment additionality) has to be proven in order to qualify for the CDM (Pearson et al, 2003;Greiner et al, 2003). The CDM Executive Board tends to lean towards the second interpretation as it asks project developers to apply a distinct additionality test.…”
Section: Coverage Of Cdm Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%