Defining Information Quality Into Health Websites: A Conceptual Framework of Health Website Information Quality for Educated Young Adults

Abstract

BackgroundToday’s health care environment encourages health care consumers to take an active role in managing their health. As digital natives, young educated adults do much of their health information management through the Internet and consider it a valid source of health advice. However, the quality of information on health websites is highly variable and dynamic. Little is known about the understandings and perceptions that young educated adults have garnered on the quality of information on health websites used for health care–related purposes.ObjectiveTo fill this gap, the aim of this study was to develop a conceptual framework of health website information quality with quality dimensions (ie, criteria) and associated quality drivers (ie, attributes) specified in the context of young educated adults’ use of health websites for health care–related purposes. This aim was achieved by (1) identifying information quality dimensions of health websites from the perspective of young educated adults; (2) identifying the importance ratings of these quality dimensions; and (3) constructing a framework of health website information quality with quality dimensions and associated drivers specified in the context of young educated adults’ use of health websites for health care–related purposes.MethodsThe study employed both qualitative and quantitative methods. Methods included semistructured group interviews and an individual quality assessment exercise grounded in visiting various websites and responding to Likert scale questions regarding the importance ratings of information quality dimensions and open-ended questions with specifying website quality drivers. Study participants included junior and senior undergraduate and graduate students in business, allied health, and public health majors. Qualitative, open-coding procedures were used to develop the conceptual framework reflecting the participants’ means of assessing information quality on health websites.ResultsFive dimensions of information quality for health websites were identified: Completeness of information, Understandability of information, Relevance of information, Depth of information, and Accuracy of information. Completeness of information and Understandability of information were rated as the two most important quality dimensions by the study participants. Results indicated that these five information quality dimensions for health websites were supported by the following main driver themes: Content, Design, Links, Consumer resources, Search functionality, Supporting references, User focus, Content FAQ, Open access, Policy statements, and Site performance.ConclusionsThis study contributes to the literature by developing a health website information quality conceptual framework with quality dimensions and associated drivers specified for a young educated adult population. The detailed quality drivers supporting the corresponding quality dimensions provide a rich picture of young educated adults’ perceptions on health website information quality. This fram...

Sources of information in health education: A cross-sectional study in Portuguese university students

“…10,11 However, both the tools and conduct codes are difficult to adopt by patients and often forgotten by providers, making necessary the investment to enhance their utilization in an easier way.…”

Quality of web pages about second‐trimester medical abortion: A cross‐sectional study of readability, comprehensiveness, and transparency

“…Quality of health‐related web‐based information is a complex and multidimensional concept (Burkell, ). Accuracy, which refers to the degree that information is in concordance with scientific evidence (Tao, LeRouge, Smith, & De Leo, ), is often the focus of studies investigating the quality of web‐based information (Eysenbach et al, ) and has been reported as poor concerning information about induced abortion (Bryant, Narasimhan, Bryant‐Comstock, & Levi, ; Rowlands, ). However, research indicates that information consumers rank other dimensions of information quality as equally important, including additional aspects such as comprehensiveness, understandability, relevance, and depth (Tao et al, ).…”

“…Accuracy, which refers to the degree that information is in concordance with scientific evidence (Tao, LeRouge, Smith, & De Leo, ), is often the focus of studies investigating the quality of web‐based information (Eysenbach et al, ) and has been reported as poor concerning information about induced abortion (Bryant, Narasimhan, Bryant‐Comstock, & Levi, ; Rowlands, ). However, research indicates that information consumers rank other dimensions of information quality as equally important, including additional aspects such as comprehensiveness, understandability, relevance, and depth (Tao et al, ). In recent years, an increasing amount of empirical studies have investigated comprehensiveness of various health‐related information on the Web (Eysenbach et al, ; Tao et al, ; Zhang, Sun, & Xie, ), referred to as the breadth or coverage of the information (Eysenbach et al, ; Tao et al, ).…”

“…However, research indicates that information consumers rank other dimensions of information quality as equally important, including additional aspects such as comprehensiveness, understandability, relevance, and depth (Tao et al, ). In recent years, an increasing amount of empirical studies have investigated comprehensiveness of various health‐related information on the Web (Eysenbach et al, ; Tao et al, ; Zhang, Sun, & Xie, ), referred to as the breadth or coverage of the information (Eysenbach et al, ; Tao et al, ). Transparency, which may also be referred to as technical criteria or proxy indicators, is another identified dimension of importance and refers to the details presented on the web page concerning the quality of the production (Burkell, ; Eysenbach et al, ).…”

Developing accurate and transparent low‐risk drinking guidelines: implications for providers, patients and health information consumers

“…providing important details about decisions) strongly influences the perception that such information is of high quality [8]. Research exploring how consumers appraise the quality of health information suggests that transparency is critical for determining whether the source of health information is credible.…”