2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Human Pluripotency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We indeed identified a positive correlation (r = 0.57, p < 10 −16 ) between the fold-change in expression and fold-change in promoter-H3-acetylation ( Figure 3 D), and observed the expected differential acetylation in the pluripotency factors that were found differentially expressed ( Figures 2 C and 3 D). In addition, we identified the naive pluripotency factors; ZFP42 (REX1) KLF2 and KLF4 ( Kalkan and Smith, 2014 , Yilmaz and Benvenisty, 2019 ) to be hyper-acetylated, while the primed marker DUSP6 ( Messmer et al., 2019 ) was hypo-acetylated ( Figures 3 D and 3E). Overall our results suggest that ZMYM2 functions to repress a large set of germline-related genes, possibly in an HDAC1/2-mediated manner, while on the other hand it normally primes a second smaller set of genes that are related to somatic differentiation, likely as a secondary effect of the first gene set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We indeed identified a positive correlation (r = 0.57, p < 10 −16 ) between the fold-change in expression and fold-change in promoter-H3-acetylation ( Figure 3 D), and observed the expected differential acetylation in the pluripotency factors that were found differentially expressed ( Figures 2 C and 3 D). In addition, we identified the naive pluripotency factors; ZFP42 (REX1) KLF2 and KLF4 ( Kalkan and Smith, 2014 , Yilmaz and Benvenisty, 2019 ) to be hyper-acetylated, while the primed marker DUSP6 ( Messmer et al., 2019 ) was hypo-acetylated ( Figures 3 D and 3E). Overall our results suggest that ZMYM2 functions to repress a large set of germline-related genes, possibly in an HDAC1/2-mediated manner, while on the other hand it normally primes a second smaller set of genes that are related to somatic differentiation, likely as a secondary effect of the first gene set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Human embryonic stem cells (ESCs), derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of the pre-implantation blastocyst, have the capacity for self-renewal in culture as well as the potential to differentiate into virtually any cell type of the developing fetus ( Schuldiner et al., 2002 , Thomson et al., 1998 ). Cultured ESCs differ from their embryonic origin in several molecular characteristics ( Huang et al., 2014 , Nakamura et al., 2016 ), but in vitro resetting of human primed ESCs to a more “naive” state has been reported to closely mimic ICM-like transcriptional and epigenetic features ( Sagi and Benvenisty, 2016 , Schlesinger and Meshorer, 2019 , Theunissen et al., 2014 , Ware et al., 2014 , Weinberger et al., 2016 , Yilmaz and Benvenisty, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a limited number of sources for these somatic stem cells and they exhibit a restricted capacity for differentiation ( Clevers, 2015 ). On the contrary, PSCs are relatively easy to be maintained in culture and can differentiate into essentially any cell types ( Rossant and Papaioannou, 1984 , Yilmaz and Benvenisty, 2019 ). Furthermore, genetically reprogramed iPSCs ( Takahashi et al., 2007 , Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006 ) offer unique opportunities for personalized medicine, because the iPSCs can be derived from patients' own cells and they are resistant to immunocompatibility issues ( Johnson and Hockemeyer, 2015 , Yilmaz and Benvenisty, 2019 ).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These protocols have been discussed in depth in a recent review (Tang et al, 2020). The PSCs and organoid technology are ideal for creating patient-specific disease models for USH, with these in vitro models possessing an identical genomic profile of the patient, offering opportunities for personalized medicine (Johnson and Hockemeyer, 2015;Yilmaz and Benvenisty, 2019).…”
Section: Stem Cells and Three-dimensional Organoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%