2011
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) structure by confirmatory factor analysis: a contribution to validation for oncological settings

Abstract: The present study gives evidence for using HADS to detect anxious and depressive states separately as originally suggested by its authors. Given that this work involved only Italian cancer inpatients, replications in different cultural/national contexts are recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each item has four possible responses (scored 0-3) and subscale scores range from 0 to 21. Psychometric testing supports the factor structure, reliability and validity in cancer populations [15,16].…”
Section: Anxiety and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Each item has four possible responses (scored 0-3) and subscale scores range from 0 to 21. Psychometric testing supports the factor structure, reliability and validity in cancer populations [15,16].…”
Section: Anxiety and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In addition, seven studies meeting the recruitment criteria for the Cosco et al review but published since the literature search was conducted were also included [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Again, the corresponding author was contacted if the inter-item correlation matrices were not included in the publication.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicate higher levels of disorder. The total HADS score and two subscales have shown good reliability and validity in oncological settings (Annunziata, Muzzatti, & Altoe, 2011;Vodermaier & Millman, 2011;Walker et al, 2007), different Dutch medical patient samples (Spinhoven et al, 1997), breast cancer patients (Love, Kissane, Bloch, & Clarke, 2002;Payne, Hoffman, Theodoulou, Dosik, & Massie, 1999), and breast cancer survivors (Alexander, Palmer, & Stone, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%