2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-009-0050-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining frailty — the holy grail of geriatric medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Frailty is of considerable interest in research and in practice, but agreement on factors necessary for defining frailty is elusive (Conroy 2009;Fried et al 2001Fried et al , 2004Rockwood and Mitnitski 2007). The 2 main ways to conceptualize frailty are the phenotype model and the cumulative deficit model (Clegg et al 2013;Fried et al 2001;Morley et al 2013;Rockwood and Mitnitski 2007).…”
Section: What Is Frailty?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frailty is of considerable interest in research and in practice, but agreement on factors necessary for defining frailty is elusive (Conroy 2009;Fried et al 2001Fried et al , 2004Rockwood and Mitnitski 2007). The 2 main ways to conceptualize frailty are the phenotype model and the cumulative deficit model (Clegg et al 2013;Fried et al 2001;Morley et al 2013;Rockwood and Mitnitski 2007).…”
Section: What Is Frailty?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is agreement regarding the importance of identifying and treating frailty, there is currently no consensus on what elements are necessary for its diagnosis (Conroy 2009;Fried et al 2001Fried et al , 2004Rockwood and Mitnitski 2007). The 2 main models for conceptualizing frailty (phenotype and cumulative deficit) form the basis for many screening and assessment tools created to date (Clegg et al 2013;Fried et al 2001;Morley et al 2013;Rockwood and Mitnitski 2007 (Fried et al 2001), the Clinical Frailty Scale (Rockwood et al 2005), the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool (Subra et al 2012), the interRAI Assessment Urgency Algorithm (Elliott 2016), or simply, walking speed (Mathias et al 1986;Muscedere et al 2016).…”
Section: Frailty Screening/assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these consequences, frailty plays a central role in the well-being of older people at the individual and societal levels, and has major public health importance. Moreover, with the projection of rapid growth in number of older people living across the world, frailty presents a rapidly escalating societal challenge on a global scale (Conroy 2009). Given its impact, frailty has been described as the most problematic expression of ageing (Clegg et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Cardiovascular Health Study cohort, Linda Fried operationalized five components commonly recognized in frailty (slowness, weakness, shrinking, low levels of activity, and exhaustion) to validate one of the most commonly used indices [55, 57]. The frailty pheno-type is associated with high vulnerability for adverse health outcomes including hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality [33, 58, 59]. The presence of multiple deficits acts synergistically to increase an individual's vulnerability to illness or hospitalization [55, 60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other definitions of frailty have been tested with variable uptake in the clinical and research setting and include: the Tilburg Frailty Indicator [63], the Groningen Frailty Indicator [64], the Edmonton Frail Scale [65], the FRAIL scale [66], and the more commonly used Frailty Index introduced by Rockwood, et al [6770]. Despite over a decade of experience in using the frailty phenotype first described by Fried et al, the best way to assess and measure frailty is still debated among geriatricians [58, 61, 7073]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%