2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.26.20080937
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Facets of Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Twitter Analysis

Abstract: Social distancing has been one of the primary mitigation strategies in the United States to control the spread of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and can be viewed as a multi-faceted public health measure. Using Twitter data, we aim to (1) define and quantify the prevalence and evolution of facets of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US in a spatiotemporal context and (2) examine the most amplified tweets among social distancing facets. We analyzed a total of 259,529 unique tweets cont… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Themes of previous studies that focus on exploration of, description of, correlation of, or predictive modeling with Twitter data during COVID-19 pandemic include sentiment analysis [17,[25][26][27][28], public attitude/interest measurement [21,[29][30][31], content analysis [15,[32][33][34][35][36], topic modeling [16,26,27,[37][38][39][40], analysis of misinformation, disinformation, or conspiracies [20,[41][42][43][44][45][46], outbreak detection or disease nowcasting/forecasting [18,19], and more [47][48][49][50][51][52]. Similarly, data from other social media channels (e.g., Weibo, Reddit, Facebook) or search engine statistics are utilized for parallel analyses related to COVID-19 pandemic as well [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]…”
Section: Going Beyond Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Themes of previous studies that focus on exploration of, description of, correlation of, or predictive modeling with Twitter data during COVID-19 pandemic include sentiment analysis [17,[25][26][27][28], public attitude/interest measurement [21,[29][30][31], content analysis [15,[32][33][34][35][36], topic modeling [16,26,27,[37][38][39][40], analysis of misinformation, disinformation, or conspiracies [20,[41][42][43][44][45][46], outbreak detection or disease nowcasting/forecasting [18,19], and more [47][48][49][50][51][52]. Similarly, data from other social media channels (e.g., Weibo, Reddit, Facebook) or search engine statistics are utilized for parallel analyses related to COVID-19 pandemic as well [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]…”
Section: Going Beyond Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers across the world are promptly trying to address this issue by screening the psychological impact of social distancing and quarantining ( Brooks et al, 2020 ; Orrù et al, 2020 ; Poli et al, 2020 ). Results from early studies using social media like Twitter and Weibo data have found that posts related to negative emotions and sensitivity to social risks have greatly increased during lockdown ( Kwon et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2020 ). Consistent with these findings, another study on the psychological impact of COVID-19 among Italians during the first week of lockdown has found that 40% of participants reported high psychological distress and about 30% showed clinically significant post-traumatic symptoms ( Marazziti et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social distancing has been one of the primary mitigation strategies used across the World to control the spread of COVID-19. Twitter analysis (an American based microblogging and social networking service) has shown that posts related to implementation and negative emotions around social distancing largely dominated their media platform, in combination with topics of social disruption and adaptation 1 . Analysis of Weibo posts (a Chinese based microblogging website) suggested that negative emotions (for example anxiety, depression and indignation) and sensitivity to social risks increased, while the scores of positive emotions (for example Oxford happiness) and life satisfaction decreased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%