2017
DOI: 10.1080/00909882.2017.1409907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining diabetes and assigning responsibility: how print media frame diabetes in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When examining how the media present health topics, researchers have replied on the theoretical construct of framing, which refers to the channels and content used to describe issues [18][19][20]. Numerous viewpoints from the high-income countries extend framing analysis of many kinds of themes to develop a framing typology of disease risks; it includes frames of medical, behavioral, or structurally focused; gain vs. loss frames; risk-amplifying vs. risk-attenuating frames; or episodic vs. thematic frames [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Health and Risks Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining how the media present health topics, researchers have replied on the theoretical construct of framing, which refers to the channels and content used to describe issues [18][19][20]. Numerous viewpoints from the high-income countries extend framing analysis of many kinds of themes to develop a framing typology of disease risks; it includes frames of medical, behavioral, or structurally focused; gain vs. loss frames; risk-amplifying vs. risk-attenuating frames; or episodic vs. thematic frames [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Health and Risks Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…108-109). The research implemented the three-phase methodological approach developed by Gounder and Ameer (2018), and modified the codes to the requirements of this study. The researcher and research assistant conducted the research in three consecutive phases of content analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cancer, causal ambiguity and a fatalistic perspective influenced people's personal abilities and inclination to take risk-reducing behaviours (Han et al, 2007). This is in contrast to diabetes, with its association with lifestyle factors, where more concrete steps are provided to prevent diabetes (Gounder & Ameer, 2018). HIV is an illness that challenges societal norms about what can be said in public, and this societal attitude has, until recently, been a barrier to HIV information uptake.…”
Section: Cause Solution and Responsibility Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the media influences what is considered important and worth reporting ('agenda setting'; see [11]), as well as how an issue is reported ('framing'; see [12]). In the context of diabetes, the media can influence who is seen as responsible, both in cause and solution [13]. Further, health news coverage can affect public policy agendas, policy makers, and the policy process [14][15][16][17], with potential effects for funding and research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%