Defining community health services in Australia: a qualitative exploration

Abstract

Background. The Community Health Program of the 1970s was an attempt to introduce a national community health model. However, although community-based health care is an important element of the health systems of all Australian states and territories, the definition of what constitutes a 'community health service' in Australia today is not clear. Methods. A search of government websites failed to provide information about the types and characteristics of services that would be included in the term. Therefore, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 key informants in roles with responsibility for primary and community health services from health departments in all Australian states and territories. Questions explored their understanding of community health services as they operated in their jurisdiction. The study adopted a blended inductive and deductive orientation within a qualitative descriptive method. Results. There was little consistency in the way community health services were described across jurisdictions. The defining attributes of a 'community health centre' described by an international peak body did not apply to services in the majority of jurisdictions in Australia. Victoria was more aligned with the description than other jurisdictions, with organisations defined through legislation and a separate funding stream to support aspects of service delivery. Conclusions. Those designing and implementing national health system programs and reforms need to be aware that terms, such as 'community health', do not mean the same thing across jurisdictions; attempts to create consistency have to recognise differences that will affect new initiatives, as well as the spread of successful policies and programs from one jurisdiction to another. Without a consistent description, it is difficult to explore the current role of community-based health care across Australia in improving access to health care.

Understanding the costs of co‐commissioning: Early experiences with co‐commissioning in Australia

“…Recognising both the fragmentation in healthcare funding and delivery, and the limited funding available to PHNs5 (Freeman et al., 2021; Lewis et al., 2022), the DoH encourages PHNs to work with other partners (such as LHDs and LHNs) through the commissioning cycle (shown in Figure 3), from identifying needs through to procuring services. Specifically, the DoH encourages PHNs to jointly commission services where ‘two or more organisations … collectively agreed as being important’ (DoH, 2016, p. 6).…”