2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining brain–machine interface applications by matching interface performance with device requirements

Abstract: Interaction with machines is mediated by Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs). Brainmachine interfaces (BMIs) are a particular class of HMIs and have so far been studied as a communication means for people who have little or no voluntary control of muscle activity. In this context, low-performing interfaces can be considered as prosthetic applications. On the other hand, for able-bodied users, a BMI would only be practical if conceived as an augmenting interface. In this paper a method is introduced for pointing ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to produce outputs within a reasonable time window is a prerequisite for online systems to be applied in everyday life where responsiveness is needed [46]. So, while the speed up is not so important in our offline validation of the system, this is an added bonus as it makes the cBCI ready for future online experimentation.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to produce outputs within a reasonable time window is a prerequisite for online systems to be applied in everyday life where responsiveness is needed [46]. So, while the speed up is not so important in our offline validation of the system, this is an added bonus as it makes the cBCI ready for future online experimentation.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 3 degree of sensing myoelectric prosthetics typically require months of intensive training, comparable comparable to training and recovery times for invasive BMI approaches for many-DoF robotic arms [12], in this paper we demonstrate that users can generate letters within minutes of first time use of our 6 DoF teleprosthetic. Powered continuous wheelchair control requires 15 bit/s and full-finger hand prosthetics 54 bit/s, well beyond the reported performance of current noninvasive BMI approaches (EEG & EMG < 3 bit/s) [13]. The band-with limitation is mainly due to limitations set by the variability and complexity of the physiological signal noise and sensor noise [14] that are orders of magnitude higher than noise in calibrating and recording eye movementsMoreover, both invasive and non-invasive BMI approaches come at significant clinical and equipment costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tasks (by convention indicated by the name of the corresponding brain activity) that are currently most popular are: slow cortical potentials, imaginary movement, P300, and steady-state visuallyevoked potentials [15,17]. Users regularly indicate that these tasks are either too slow, nonintuitive, cumbersome, or just annoying to use for control BCIs [10,12].…”
Section: User-centered Design: What Users Wantmentioning
confidence: 99%