2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-022-01353-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining brain-based OCD patient profiles using task-based fMRI and unsupervised machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following correction for false discovery rates, it was observed that the interference-dominant cluster exhibited significantly longer reaction times compared to the other patient clusters, although no other covariate differences were detected between the clusters. These findings enhance the precision of patient characterization, redefining previous neurobehavioral studies of OCD, and providing a starting point for neuroimaging-guided treatment selection (De Nadai et al, 2023).…”
Section: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Following correction for false discovery rates, it was observed that the interference-dominant cluster exhibited significantly longer reaction times compared to the other patient clusters, although no other covariate differences were detected between the clusters. These findings enhance the precision of patient characterization, redefining previous neurobehavioral studies of OCD, and providing a starting point for neuroimaging-guided treatment selection (De Nadai et al, 2023).…”
Section: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our findings indicate the IVA-S3 offers the potential for improved subgroup identification with fMRI data, as we demonstrated that the IVA-S3 is able to better preserve subject variability. A more detailed investigation of subgroup identification is beyond the scope of this work but is an emerging new area of research [4,[42][43][44][45]. Furthermore, as discussed in the previous section, the IVA might be prone to overfitting when analyzing large numbers of datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another limitation of the present study was the relatively small number of participants to obtain reliable brain conclusions (Turner et al, 2018). Fourth, emerging clustering analysis studies reported various profiles that cut across categorical nosologies in ADHD (Bergwerff et al, 2019; De Nadai et al, 2023; Fernández-Martín et al, 2023). We cannot rule out the existence of OCD and ADHD patterns that might explain these results and, perhaps, the heterogeneous decision-making strategies found in the previous literature (Apergis-Schoute et al, 2023; Hauser et al, 2014; Mazurki et al, 2021; Sethi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%