2011
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Bloodstream Infections Related to Central Venous Catheters in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The objective of this review was to determine whether consistent definitions were used in published studies of bloodstream infections due to central venous catheters in patients with cancer (ie, catheter-related or catheter-associated bloodstream infections). Review of 191 studies reporting catheter-related or catheter-associated bloodstream infections in patients with cancer revealed a lack of uniformity in these definitions. We grouped definitions by type, with 39 articles failing to cite or report a definit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
(189 reference statements)
1
61
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…were the most common cause of CRBSI in our study, similar to the studies of Schiffer (3) and Hentrich (26). 4 Arch Crit Care Med. 2016; 1(4):e7732.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…were the most common cause of CRBSI in our study, similar to the studies of Schiffer (3) and Hentrich (26). 4 Arch Crit Care Med. 2016; 1(4):e7732.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, patients with cancer have 1.4 to 2.2 infections per 1000 catheter-days for central venous catheters (CVCs) (3). Catheter-related bloodstream infections cause serious morbidity and mortality and are associated with increased hospital costs and length of stay (4,5). Attributable rate of mortality is 0% to 35%, based on the degree of control for severity of illness (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further validation of these criteria is needed but in particular it is worth noting that the Centers for Disease Control central venous device infection definition also entails a similar process of eliminating alternative sources for positive blood cultures. 33 Moreover it has also been proposed that any bacteremia, irrespective of source and within 4 weeks of graft implantation, should automatically be regarded with suspicion owing to the likelihood of hematogenous "seeding" to the prosthetic luminal surface before endothelial coverage is presumed to have occurred. 5 Notwithstanding significant deficiencies in the published evidence and in order to define a necessary time point "cutoff", the recommendation that AGI should be strongly suspected if CT demonstrates perigraft fluid at 3 months post-graft insertion was considered reasonable and consistent with clinical experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mitral valve prolapse 55 and bicuspid aortic valve) or with indwelling central venous catheters placed for vascular access. 64 Valve disease may occur as a consequence of CTRCD. This usually manifests as mitral regurgitation caused by annular dilation or apical tethering in the setting of LV dysfunction and secondary LV remodelling.…”
Section: Valvular Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%