Defining barriers and enablers for clinical pathway implementation in complex clinical settings

Abstract

BackgroundWhile clinical pathways have the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs, their true impact has been limited by variable implementation strategies and suboptimal research designs. This paper explores a comprehensive set of factors perceived by emergency department staff and administrative leads to influence clinical pathway implementation within the complex and dynamic environments of community emergency department settings.MethodsThis descriptive, qualitative study involved emergency health professionals and administrators of 15 community hospitals across Ontario, Canada. As part of our larger cluster randomized controlled trial, each site was in the preparation phase to implement one of two clinical pathways: pediatric asthma or pediatric vomiting and diarrhea. Data were collected from three sources: (i) a mediated group discussion with site champions during the project launch meeting; (ii) a semi-structured site visit of each emergency department; and (iii) key informant interviews with an administrative lead from each hospital. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to guide the interviews and thematically analyze the data. Domains within each major theme were then mapped onto the COM-B model—capability, opportunity, and motivation—of the Behaviour Change Wheel.ResultsSeven discrete themes and 58 subthemes were identified that comprised a set of barriers and enablers relevant to the planned clinical pathway implementation. Within two themes, three distinct levels of impact emerged, namely (i) the individual health professional, (ii) the emergency department team, and (iii) the broader hospital context. The TDF domains occurring most frequently were Memory, Attention and Decision Processes, Environmental Context and Resources, Behavioural Regulation, and Reinforcement. Mapping these barriers and enablers onto the COM-B model provided an organized perspective on how these issues may be interacting. Several factors were viewed as both negative and positive across different perspectives. Two of the seven themes were limited to one component, while four involved all three components of the COM-B model.ConclusionsUsing a theory-based approach ensured systematic and comprehensive identification of relevant barriers and enablers to clinical pathway implementation in ED settings. The COM-B system of the Behaviour Change Wheel provided a useful perspective on how these factors might interact to effect change.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01815710.

Health care providers’ perceptions of factors that influence the provision of acute stroke care in urban and rural settings: A qualitative study

“…5,6 In many developed nations, these treatment modalities have been collated into sets of guidelines, in an effort to bridge the divide between evidence and clinical practice. 7 A key example of this is the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care's Acute Stroke Clinical Care Standard, which outlines the care that patients with stroke should expect to receive within Australian hospitals. 8 Regrettably, the care processes which comprise the Clinical Care Standard are not used ubiquitously, with individuals in Australia's rural areas seemingly having inferior access to acute stroke care.…”

Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Implementation of a Clinical Decision aid for the Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndrome: A Qualitative Study

“…Knowledge of the scienti c rationale and pre-implementation skills training have repeatedly been cited as enablers to implementation of new guidelines and decision aids in the ER and other contexts. 6,23,11 Effective dissemination of the decision aid is crucial and should include publication in presentation of the guidelines in a variety of media, high quality journals and educational meetings within the department. These challenges can also be addressed by thorough pre-implementation training, continuing medical education (CME) credits and by providing a supporting appraisal of the evidence alongside the decision aid.…”

Clinical Pathway Management Based on Bibliometric Analysis in China

“…Since the literatures were published in 1999-2019, the time was divided into 1, and 21 time slices were formed. We set the threshold to (2,2,20), (4,3,20), (3,3,20), topN per plice=50.According to the specific content of the software, visual analysis of number of published papers, keywords, and research institutions was carried out.…”

“…[1,2] Clinical Pathways (CPs) are increasingly used in healthcare settings and recommended by broader healthcare systems internationally as a form of quality improvement. [3] CPsare viewed as important strategies to improve medical care in China. [4] In 2017, the former…”