2020
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining appropriateness criteria for endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of adult dental implant patients with incidental maxillary sinus findings on conebeam computed tomography

Abstract: Objectives: Conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is commonly requested by dental implant surgeons, preoperatively, for patients being considered for dental implants. Incidental maxillary sinus findings often result in otolaryngology (ENT) referral for further assessment. CBCT findings include transient and benign mucosal changes that may not require any intervention and therefore unnecessarily delay implant surgery. We aim to define appropriateness criteria for ESS in the management of adult dental impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology is well described and has previously been utilised defining appropriateness criteria for ESS during management of uncomplicated adult CRS and adult recurrent acute rhinosinusitis 1,10,11 . We have used a similar process to develop BRS guidance on the management of incidental findings in the maxillary sinuses with regard to dental implantation 12 and to develop guidance on the treatment of COVID‐19 related loss of smell 13 . This exercise or process aims to detect and achieve consensus amongst a group of experts and is ideally suited to evaluating the appropriateness of use of medical interventions where the evidence base is limited, which consume significant resources or where use remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology is well described and has previously been utilised defining appropriateness criteria for ESS during management of uncomplicated adult CRS and adult recurrent acute rhinosinusitis 1,10,11 . We have used a similar process to develop BRS guidance on the management of incidental findings in the maxillary sinuses with regard to dental implantation 12 and to develop guidance on the treatment of COVID‐19 related loss of smell 13 . This exercise or process aims to detect and achieve consensus amongst a group of experts and is ideally suited to evaluating the appropriateness of use of medical interventions where the evidence base is limited, which consume significant resources or where use remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology is well described and has previously been utilised defining appropriateness criteria for ESS during management of uncomplicated adult CRS and adult recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (1,11,12). We have used a similar process to develop BRS guidance on the management of incidental findings in the maxillary sinuses with regard to dental implantation (13), and to develop guidance on the treatment of COVID-19 related loss of smell (14). This exercise or process aims to detect and achieve consensus amongst a group of experts, and is ideally suited to evaluating the appropriateness of use of medical interventions where the evidence base is limited, which consume significant resources or where use remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%