2021
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining a minimal clinically meaningful difference in 12‐month estimated glomerular filtration rate for clinical trials in deceased donor kidney transplantation

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted this study to elucidate whether early eGFR slopes, from 12 up to 24 months after biopsy, could serve as a surrogate for future allograft loss in patients diagnosed with late ABMR. The search for a “minimally clinically meaningful difference” with respect to eGFR slopes as an accepted trial endpoint in kidney transplantation is ongoing and several recent studies have addressed this issue ( 8 , 9 , 21 23 ). In trials studying chronic kidney disease, eGFR slopes were recently accepted as a surrogate endpoint by the FDA, but their value in late ABMR remains elusive ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted this study to elucidate whether early eGFR slopes, from 12 up to 24 months after biopsy, could serve as a surrogate for future allograft loss in patients diagnosed with late ABMR. The search for a “minimally clinically meaningful difference” with respect to eGFR slopes as an accepted trial endpoint in kidney transplantation is ongoing and several recent studies have addressed this issue ( 8 , 9 , 21 23 ). In trials studying chronic kidney disease, eGFR slopes were recently accepted as a surrogate endpoint by the FDA, but their value in late ABMR remains elusive ( 12 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 At the mid-range, a change in at least five eGFR can represent a clinically meaningful difference in kidney function. 35 The individual fits showed major differences between models. Many kidney transplant patients have different eGFR growth and eGFR stable values, hitting a peak value and then losing some amount of function and stabilizing at a different value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an eGFR of 40 is indicative of reduced kidney function while an eGFR of 60 may be interpreted as acceptable function 27 . At the mid‐range, a change in at least five eGFR can represent a clinically meaningful difference in kidney function 35 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes of interest included mean eGFR at prespecified time points throughout the trial and changes in eGFR from baseline through week 52. To further evaluate the impact of study treatment over time, a responder analysis was performed to determine the percentage of participants with a clinically meaningful change from baseline in eGFR (≥ 5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) [ 9 , 10 ] as well as a change from baseline ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at weeks 26 and 52. All renal outcome measures were assessed for the total trial population by randomized treatment allocation (palopegteriparatide and placebo/palopegteriparatide) and stratified by baseline renal function (eGFR < 60 and ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%