2006
DOI: 10.1007/11912873_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining a Data Quality Model for Web Portals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, as a pilot study, we used a survey previously developed for a subset of DQ attributes, specifically for the attributes classified for the Web portal function ''Data Points and Integration'' (In this pilot survey the subjects were contacted by e-mail, and a total of 69 effective responses were received; more details of this work are available in (Caro et al 2006)). The purpose of this was to use this experience to prepare a better questionnaire.…”
Section: Validating the Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as a pilot study, we used a survey previously developed for a subset of DQ attributes, specifically for the attributes classified for the Web portal function ''Data Points and Integration'' (In this pilot survey the subjects were contacted by e-mail, and a total of 69 effective responses were received; more details of this work are available in (Caro et al 2006)). The purpose of this was to use this experience to prepare a better questionnaire.…”
Section: Validating the Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this assignment we used as a basis the appropriateness of each attribute (based on its definition), in relation to the objective of each portal functionality and the user's DQ expectation. As a result of this phase, we obtained a set of 34 DQ attributes through which to evaluate the DQ in Web portals [4]. Figure 1 shows the matrix and an example of the classification of DQ attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We detected certain synonymous amongst the attributes identified. Those attributes were combined along with those which had similar names and meanings, thus obtaining a final set of 41 attributes [4]. (2) In the second phase, we created a matrix with which to classify the DQ attributes obtained in the previous phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This SLR is based on a previous SLR [2], which covered the years 1996 to 2005, and in which 33 attributes considered to be relevant for Web portal data quality were chosen. These attributes were then used to define a quality model for the assessment of Web portal data quality, namely PDQM (Portal Data Quality Model), in [3]. The SLR which is presented here covers 2006 to the end of 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%