2004
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.036681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defined Protein Conjugates as Signaling Agents in Immunoassays

Abstract: Background: Conventional methods for conjugation of macromolecules, such as antibodies and reporter groups, typically yield a mixture ranging from unconjugated starting materials to large aggregates. We explored the use of a solid-phase process to allow improved control in conjugation of macromolecules for use in immunodiagnostic reagents. Methods: Activated components were sequentially delivered to an immobilized core protein, linking in concentric layers. For immunodiagnostic reagents, proteins with the desi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expressing modules individually and then linking the modules together would overcome these challenges as well as allow independent posttranslational modification of each module. Even the best noncovalent linkages (7)(8)(9) or reversible covalent linkages, including disulfide bonds (10,11), would allow rearrangement of polyproteams, so irreversible covalent linkage is required. There are a limited number of mutually unreactive (orthogonal) chemical reactions (12); therefore, it is impractical to link more than a few building blocks in a one-pot reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressing modules individually and then linking the modules together would overcome these challenges as well as allow independent posttranslational modification of each module. Even the best noncovalent linkages (7)(8)(9) or reversible covalent linkages, including disulfide bonds (10,11), would allow rearrangement of polyproteams, so irreversible covalent linkage is required. There are a limited number of mutually unreactive (orthogonal) chemical reactions (12); therefore, it is impractical to link more than a few building blocks in a one-pot reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein‐protein monoconjugation was reported as early as 1977 using a SP approach, but there were few advances over the following two decades [36] . Driven by increasing biomedical needs, this approach has regained attention in the last two decades and more elegant SPS strategies have since been devised to open access to a greater pool of functionalized proteins and higher‐order protein conjugates for immunodetection or as nanotransporters [5,10] . The preparation of protein conjugates by a SP approach offers several advantages in terms of ease of purification and quality control of the product due to formation of single species.…”
Section: Solid‐phase Synthesis: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other protein‐protein monoconjugates were obtained in this fashion but are mainly limited to glycoproteins. Russell et al [5,73] . applied a modified thiol reactive SP to gain access to a series of defined protein conjugates (Figure 4a).…”
Section: Sps As a Versatile Platform For Preparing Precise Protein Olmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…/jmr.1095 So far, all of these methods have displayed both advantages and limitations related to the specific chemical approach being used. Among the most interesting methods, Russell et al (2002;2004) proposed a batch-mode solid-phase protein conjugation procedure, exploiting the thiol-maleimide chemistry. However, this batch-wise method exploits the same chemistry for both conjugation and protein immobilization and does not allow the repeated use of the solid phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%