2011
DOI: 10.1090/s0065-9266-2010-00593-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definable additive categories: purity and model theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, note that an object Y of G is pure-injective if, and only if, for every set S, each morphism f : [Pr,Theorem 5.4]). Then lemmas 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4, together with corollary 2.2 of [op.cit] are valid here.…”
Section: The Following Conditions Holdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, note that an object Y of G is pure-injective if, and only if, for every set S, each morphism f : [Pr,Theorem 5.4]). Then lemmas 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4, together with corollary 2.2 of [op.cit] are valid here.…”
Section: The Following Conditions Holdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, H(A) is closed under pure epimorphic images. Now let C be a finitely accessible category with products and let D be a definable subcategory of C. Note that definable subcategories need not be finitely accessible: for instance, the category of divisible abelian groups is a definable subcategory of the category Ab of abelian groups, but it is not finitely accessible [32,Example 10.3]. Nevertheless, we may establish our covering result in such a context because of the good behaviour with respect to purity, namely: purity in a definable subcategory is just the restriction of purity in the larger category (see, e.g., [32] for details).…”
Section: Theorem 26 Let C Be a Finitely Accessible Category And A Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that an additive category is locally finitely presented if it is finitely accessible and cocomplete (i.e., has all colimits) or, equivalently, if it is finitely accessible and complete (i.e., has all limits) [32]. Now we are able to extend the existence of flat covers for comodules over a semiperfect coalgebra [10,Theorem 3.9] (also see [8, Corollary 2.5]) to comodules over an arbitrary coalgebra provided the category of comodules is finitely accessible Grothendieck.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations