2005
DOI: 10.1038/nn1474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia

Abstract: We evaluated signal-noise discrimination in children with and without dyslexia, using magnocellular and parvocellular visual stimuli presented either with or without high noise. Dyslexic children had elevated contrast thresholds when stimuli of either type were presented in high noise, but performed as well as non-dyslexic children when either type was displayed without noise. Our findings suggest that deficits in noise exclusion, not magnocellular processing, contribute to the etiology of dyslexia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
224
5
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
30
224
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the present results raise the possibility that children with language learning disabilities have very serious problems with noise exclusion, which will certainly have tremendous consequences for normal phonological development. A similar proposal has recently been made with regard to visual (magnocellular) deficits that seem frequently associated with dyslexia (45). The authors showed that dyslexic children do not have visual (magnocellular) processing problems per se but rather problems of noise exclusion that become apparent in visual tasks using noisy displays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, the present results raise the possibility that children with language learning disabilities have very serious problems with noise exclusion, which will certainly have tremendous consequences for normal phonological development. A similar proposal has recently been made with regard to visual (magnocellular) deficits that seem frequently associated with dyslexia (45). The authors showed that dyslexic children do not have visual (magnocellular) processing problems per se but rather problems of noise exclusion that become apparent in visual tasks using noisy displays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The fact that patterns of impairment are dissociable from cortical-dorsal stream function (Figure 7) shows that the discovery of a novel mechanism of disease can also bring new insights into brain function. Indeed, our findings seem to seriously challenge theories that explain global coherence deficits based on magnocellular impairment (e.g., dyslexia) (25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, the causal relation between sensory deficits and dyslexia is highly controversial because several studies have found that (i) not all dyslexic persons have sensory deficits and (ii) dyslexics' sensory impairments are not confined to tasks that require rapid sensory processing (31)(32)(33). The lack of a consistent sensory deficit associated with dyslexia has been taken to support the phonological deficit hypothesis, i.e., the view that dyslexia is caused by a deficit that is specific to phoneme processing (1,5,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%