2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deficient multisensory integration in schizophrenia: An event-related potential study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings also correspond with evidence from an ERP study on audiovisual speech processing in SZP and HC (Stekelenburg et al 2013). This study found no group differences in P2 amplitudes in response to congruent and incongruent audiovisual speech stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present findings also correspond with evidence from an ERP study on audiovisual speech processing in SZP and HC (Stekelenburg et al 2013). This study found no group differences in P2 amplitudes in response to congruent and incongruent audiovisual speech stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…auditory signal was not systematically varied. Similar to the present GFP effect, Stekelenburg et al (2013) found no differences in ERPs to congruent and incongruent audiovisual speech around 200 ms after auditory onset between HC and SZP. Hence, the present finding indicates an intact detection of audiovisual stimulus incongruence in the auditory cortex of SZP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While analyses of task performance and fMRI data have shown abnormalities of audiovisual integration in schizophrenia [16,45], on the whole, neurophysiological studies of audiovisual integration in psychiatric patients are very few. As far as we know, only 1 EEG study has reported deficits of multisensory interaction for N100 in schizophrenia, and even so, the laterality of N100 deficits was unclear [46]. Furthermore, while the importance of P50 as an index of sensory gating has been established [14], no studies have reported multisensory integration effects of P50 for any psychiatric disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has investigated crossmodal interactions across typical development and ageing (Hillock-Dunn and Wallace, 2012;Poliakoff et al, 2006), and in neurodevelopmental disorders such as dyslexia (Facoetti et al, 2010;Harrar et al, 2014), autism spectrum condition (Foss-Feig et al, 2010), schizophrenia (Stekelenburg et al, 2013), and developmental dyspraxia (Bair et al, 2012). Few researchers investigating crossmodal processing, however, have attempted to constrain unisensory performance, that is, equating performance between par ticipants in a single sensory modality before measuring the effect of adding an additional modality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%