2005
DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment

Abstract: Context How often physicians alter their clinical behavior because of the threat of malpractice liability, termed defensive medicine, and the consequences of those changes, are central questions in the ongoing medical malpractice reform debate. Objective To study the prevalence and characteristics of defensive medicine among physicians practicing in high-liability specialties during a period of substantial instability in the malpractice environment. Design, Setting, and Participants Mail survey of physicians i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
487
7
35

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 991 publications
(547 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
15
487
7
35
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Previous research on the effect of malpractice costs on the practice of medicine has focused on the use of a relatively small set of specific procedures, physician surveys of "consciously defensive" medicine, or comparisons of hospital spending on heart attack patients in states with and without tort-reform initiatives. 5 These analyses do not quantify the aggregate effect of an increase in malpractice liability on clinical practice, total spending, or spending on physician services. Furthermore, many of these studies were conducted prior to the mid-1990s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Previous research on the effect of malpractice costs on the practice of medicine has focused on the use of a relatively small set of specific procedures, physician surveys of "consciously defensive" medicine, or comparisons of hospital spending on heart attack patients in states with and without tort-reform initiatives. 5 These analyses do not quantify the aggregate effect of an increase in malpractice liability on clinical practice, total spending, or spending on physician services. Furthermore, many of these studies were conducted prior to the mid-1990s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one survey of physicians in six specialties at high risk of litigation, 93% of respondents reported practicing defensive medicine, and among physicians who detailed their most recent defensive act, 43% of them reported using imaging technology in clinically unnecessary circumstances [14]. Other possibilities of imaging over-testing include ‘ignorance of what specific imaging studies are needed and when; high public expectations for imaging tests; and self-referral (when physicians own imaging equipment or when they refer patients to imaging centers in which they hold equity positions).’[3] Further work by the medical community is needed to address all these issues to limit their potentially adverse impact in patient care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors kept pace with other evidence‐based medicine factors for driving the post‐imaging clinician decision making 30. A 2005 survey of Pennsylvania ED physicians found that 63% ordered radiologic tests that were not indicated, while 93% of physicians, in general, practice defensive medicine 31. A Massachusetts‐based survey revealed that 23% of all types of CTs were ordered for defensive reasons 32.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%