2022
DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2021.2023290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defense treaties increase domestic support for military action and casualty tolerance: Evidence from survey experiments in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, past research has primarily examined whether international legal prohibitions can affect support for state behaviour (Cope & Crabtree, 2020; Wallace, 2014). A few recent studies have broadened the scope of analysis and examined under what conditions the publics of member states are willing to fulfil collective security commitments (Berejikian & Justwan, 2022; Tomz & Weeks, 2021); however, our research is the first to consider public responses to these commitments by a non‐American audience during an immediate, real‐world foreign policy crisis. Third, we expand the scope of the gender gap literature (e.g., Eichenberg, 2019) to examine whether women are more responsive than men to frames emphasizing alliance commitments when deciding whether to support the use of force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, past research has primarily examined whether international legal prohibitions can affect support for state behaviour (Cope & Crabtree, 2020; Wallace, 2014). A few recent studies have broadened the scope of analysis and examined under what conditions the publics of member states are willing to fulfil collective security commitments (Berejikian & Justwan, 2022; Tomz & Weeks, 2021); however, our research is the first to consider public responses to these commitments by a non‐American audience during an immediate, real‐world foreign policy crisis. Third, we expand the scope of the gender gap literature (e.g., Eichenberg, 2019) to examine whether women are more responsive than men to frames emphasizing alliance commitments when deciding whether to support the use of force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%