2009
DOI: 10.1080/10242690701775533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defense Spending and Aggregate Output in the United States

Abstract: In this article the effect of defense spending on aggregate output is discussed. Recent publications in this area are reviewed and new additional evidence is provided. The findings presented in this paper are supportive of the positive effect of defense spending. However, in light of the contrary evidence presented in other papers, empirical evidence taken as a whole, suggests that a definitive conclusion about the effect of defense spending at this time should be avoided.Defense spending, Aggregate output, In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
27
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies found a feedback between military expenditure and economic growth in the United States. Our empirical result is also not consistent with the findings of Atesoglu (2002Atesoglu ( , 2009, which states that military expenditures does not promote economic growth in real output but responds to aggregate income shocks in the United States. Our empirical findings are different from some of the previous studies might be due to the following reasons.…”
Section: The United Statescontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Both studies found a feedback between military expenditure and economic growth in the United States. Our empirical result is also not consistent with the findings of Atesoglu (2002Atesoglu ( , 2009, which states that military expenditures does not promote economic growth in real output but responds to aggregate income shocks in the United States. Our empirical findings are different from some of the previous studies might be due to the following reasons.…”
Section: The United Statescontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The similar result also found in case for Fiji includes exports in production function Narayan and Singh, (2007). Recently, Using the VAR approach, positive linkage is also evident for Sri Lanka (Wijeweera and Webb, 2009); for US (Atesoglu, 2009); South Asia (Gupta et al 2010); for India (Tiwari and Shahbaz, 2012).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A series of studies found that military spending neglected/reducing the economic growth [Smith, (1977) ;Boretsky, (1975) ;Sivard, (1977); Atesoglu (2002), Ocal and Brauer (2007) and Smith and Tuttle (2008)]. However, the opposite evidence also exists in the earlier literature that military spending promotes economic growth [Benoit (1973[Benoit ( , 1978; Halicioglu (2003Halicioglu ( , 2004; Wijeweera and Webb (2009) ;Atesoglu, (2009) and, Wijewerra and Webb (2011)]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The analysis showed a long run and positive association between military spending and economic growth while non-military spending boosts economic growth more than military spending. Atesoglu (2004) found a strong effect of military spending on economic growth but Cuaresma and Reitschuler (2003) documented an inverse relationship between military spending and economic growth for U. S economy.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%