2022
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defending democracy: Militant and popular models of democratic self‐defense

Abstract: With the electoral victories of authoritarian populists in a range of parliamentary democracies in recent years, there has been a growing unease with the ability of existing democratic institutions to keep such authoritarian threats under control. The election of authoritarian leaning figures in countries such as Hungary, Poland, Philippines, Brazil, Russia, and the United States has led many to doubt the capacity of the institutions of parliamentary democracy to protect themselves against democratic backslidi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This double dependency, or even parallelism or alignment, between democracy and education, means that education should consider a similar attitude toward protecting itself as democracy does. A defensive (or self-defending, or militant) democracy is a democracy that takes special measures to protect itself (Stahl and Popp-Madsen, 2022). These notions are perhaps most prominent in Israel, where issues of national security and fighting terrorism (Gross, 2003;Weinblum, 2015) on the one hand and extreme political groups (mostly from the right wing) (Cohen-Almagor, 1994) on the other challenge the very existence of the state or the (already contested and problematic) democratic character of Israel.…”
Section: Broader Social Contexts: Changing Society Democracy Self-def...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This double dependency, or even parallelism or alignment, between democracy and education, means that education should consider a similar attitude toward protecting itself as democracy does. A defensive (or self-defending, or militant) democracy is a democracy that takes special measures to protect itself (Stahl and Popp-Madsen, 2022). These notions are perhaps most prominent in Israel, where issues of national security and fighting terrorism (Gross, 2003;Weinblum, 2015) on the one hand and extreme political groups (mostly from the right wing) (Cohen-Almagor, 1994) on the other challenge the very existence of the state or the (already contested and problematic) democratic character of Israel.…”
Section: Broader Social Contexts: Changing Society Democracy Self-def...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These notions are perhaps most prominent in Israel, where issues of national security and fighting terrorism (Gross, 2003;Weinblum, 2015) on the one hand and extreme political groups (mostly from the right wing) (Cohen-Almagor, 1994) on the other challenge the very existence of the state or the (already contested and problematic) democratic character of Israel. However, following electoral victories of authoritarian populists in a range of parliamentary democracies in recent years, 4 there has been a growing unease with the ability of existing democratic institutions to keep such authoritarian threats under control, and doubts about the capacity of the institutions of parliamentary democracy to protect themselves against democratic backsliding have led to a resurgence of academic interest in the ideas of democratic self-defense, democratic self-preservation, and perhaps the most frequent term of militant democracy (Stahl and Popp-Madsen, 2022).…”
Section: Broader Social Contexts: Changing Society Democracy Self-def...mentioning
confidence: 99%