2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defects in composite structures: Its effects and prediction methods – A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…elamination, or interlaminar fracture, is a major failure mode for composite laminates, which still attracts researchers' attention despite the huge number of dedicated studies during the last decades [1][2][3][4][5]. Since the earlier works, it has been recognised that the structural behaviour of a laminate affected by delamination can be analysed by schematising the laminate as an appropriate assemblage of sublaminates [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…elamination, or interlaminar fracture, is a major failure mode for composite laminates, which still attracts researchers' attention despite the huge number of dedicated studies during the last decades [1][2][3][4][5]. Since the earlier works, it has been recognised that the structural behaviour of a laminate affected by delamination can be analysed by schematising the laminate as an appropriate assemblage of sublaminates [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5): (9) Considering that, at every x, the cross-sections of the two layers are forced to perform equal rotation and equal curvature to one another (assumption 3) and that the behavior of the two layers is always elastic (assumption 2):…”
Section: Equilibrium Of Each Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical step in finite element modeling is the simulation of the connection between the components, which may be modeled using interface, cohesive or solid finite elements. However, the interface elements, which model the contact, are often neither robust nor computationally efficient tools, especially with the notension or smeared cracking approaches; in fact, the iterative numerical process that they entail may be unstable and pose difficulties in convergence [9,11,33,47]. The cohesive elements, which are often governed by a strengthbased initiation criterion followed by a fracture mechanics criterion for crack propagation, guarantee numerical accuracy as long as their free parameters are calibrated accurately, which may be difficult [60][61][62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Вопрос влияния различных дефектов на механические характеристики композитных конструкций весьма детально изложен в работах [2,3]: проведен всесторонний обзор суще-ствующих математических и экспериментальных методов, отмечены заслуги отечественных ученых В. В. Болотина, Л.М. Качанова, Ю.М.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified