Defectiveness and strength of float glass

Boguslavskii, I. A.; Butaev, A. M.; Romakin, A. N.; Ostrolutskaya, N. V.

doi:10.1007/bf00701836

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1985

2008

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to the higher amount of tin in the tin side of the glass, and to contact of the tin side with the rollers in the annealing lehr, the two sides of the float glass often exhibit different properties. First of all, the tin side has lower strength and larger flaws than the air side [3][4][5][6][7]. Krohn et al [4] determined that the average size of the flaws for the tin side of a commercial float glass was 28.9 lm, in comparison to 13.0 lm for the air side.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%