1988
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/80.10.756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defective Estrogen Receptors in Human Mammary Cancers: Their Significance in Defining Hormone Dependence1

Abstract: Neither estrogen dependence nor clinical response to hormone therapy of the tumor is guaranteed by the mere presence of receptors for estrogens (ERs) or progesterones (PRs). Immunohistochemical staining of ER with polyclonal anti-ER antibodies after in vitro transformation has enabled the identification of two types of defective ER among human breast cancers: those that are unable to bind to the nucleus in a hormone-filled state and those that bind to the nucleus as naked ER. Preliminary clinical correlation s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be because pS2 expression may reflect a genuinely oestrogen-sensitive tumour (Schwartz et al, 1991). In keeping with this is the experimental (Johnson et al, 1989) and clinical evidence that pS2 expression predicts a subsequent response to hormonal manipulation initially (Skilton et al, 1989;Schwartz et al, 1991;Henry et al, 1990;Ramm et al, 1988;Henry et al, 1988) and on relapse (Henry et al, 1991;Schwartz et al, 1991). Since only 50%-65% of oestrogen receptor-positive tumours actually respond to anti-oestrogen therapy (Stack et al, 1988), we concur that pS2 may be more useful than oestrogen receptor measurement in predicting response to endocrine therapy (Predine et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This could be because pS2 expression may reflect a genuinely oestrogen-sensitive tumour (Schwartz et al, 1991). In keeping with this is the experimental (Johnson et al, 1989) and clinical evidence that pS2 expression predicts a subsequent response to hormonal manipulation initially (Skilton et al, 1989;Schwartz et al, 1991;Henry et al, 1990;Ramm et al, 1988;Henry et al, 1988) and on relapse (Henry et al, 1991;Schwartz et al, 1991). Since only 50%-65% of oestrogen receptor-positive tumours actually respond to anti-oestrogen therapy (Stack et al, 1988), we concur that pS2 may be more useful than oestrogen receptor measurement in predicting response to endocrine therapy (Predine et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Numerous mechanisms explaining this resistance have been suggested, including crosstalk with or increased expression of components of growth receptor pathways, especially those belonging to the epidermal growth factor superfamily or to insulin growth factor receptors. other postulated mechanism include aberrant activation of other growth factor signaling pathways, overexpression of myc, cycline e1, and cycline D1, epigenetic modification, as well as mutations, deletions, and truncations in the ERα gene (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). In the presence of a nonfunctional er, Ar may be the primary driver of downstream signaling for cell growth (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tamoxifen is used to treat estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers because it competes with estradiol for es trogen receptors and then the tamoxifen-receptor com plex binds to nuclear acceptor sites for extended periods of time [22][23][24], This action renders the tissue refractory to the proliferative effect of estradiol until more receptors are made available again [251. Tamoxifen has also been shown to interact with other binding sites in the cell and has many effects that arc apparently not mediated through the steroid receptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%