Proceedings International Test Conference 1998 (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36270)
DOI: 10.1109/test.1998.743212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect-oriented testing of mixed-signal ICs: some industrial experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CPU time of the golden stand-alone simulation is 244s. The CPU time of the Standard AS/DOTSS approach [16] is calculated in the usual way (#faults * CPU time of golden = 412 * 244s = 100437s). The CPU time mostly depends on how many measurement time points are set.…”
Section: Results Ffs With Sensitivity Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPU time of the golden stand-alone simulation is 244s. The CPU time of the Standard AS/DOTSS approach [16] is calculated in the usual way (#faults * CPU time of golden = 412 * 244s = 100437s). The CPU time mostly depends on how many measurement time points are set.…”
Section: Results Ffs With Sensitivity Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any random defects that affect one or more building blocks within the loop will likely cause fail-to-lock condition. Other methods presented in the literature, such as the structural-based test approach for RF devices in [11] and the defect-oriented test methods for mixed-signal circuits in [12], can effectively detect catastrophic failures at a relatively low cost. We can apply these simple tests first in our test application and terminate the test process once a failure is detected.…”
Section: Test Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained before [2,3], there are methods to identify slightly deviating products, for instance by making use of moving limits. For effective EOS/ESD screens, pins are identified that are typically seen as affected in EOS/ESD returns, and analogue tests are identified that would be influenced by an additional resistance path at the typical EOS/ESD location.…”
Section: Continuous Eos/esd Return Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%