Defect Management in Agile Software Development

Noor, Rida; Khan, Muhammad Fahad

doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2014.03.07

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…AQUSA (Automatic Quality User Story Artisan) software tool based on natural language processing (NLP) should be used to find quality defects in requirements as it detects defect in requirements and suggests some possible solutions. Defect detection in early iterations will prevent the defects to appear in next iteration, and therefore we get better quality product [118]. 6.10.…”

Section: Requirement Specification and Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Requirement Engineering Challenges in Agile Software Development

Rasheed

Zafar

Shehryar

et al. 2021

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agile software development has large success rate due to its benefits and promising nature but natively where the size of the project is small. Requirement engineering (RE) is crucial as in each software development life cycle, “Requirements” play a vital role. Though agile provides values to customer’s business needs, changing requirement, and interaction, we also have to face impediments in agile, many of which are related to requirement challenges. This article aims to find out the challenges being faced during requirement engineering of agile projects. Many research studies have been conducted on requirement challenges which are somehow biased, no suggestions are given to improve the agile development process, and the research does not highlight large-scale agile development challenges. Hence, this article covers all the challenges discussed above and presents a comprehensive overview of agile models from requirement engineering perspective. The findings and results can be very helpful for software industry to improve development process as well as for researchers who want to work further in this direction.

show abstract

Section: Requirement Specification and Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Requirement Engineering Challenges in Agile Software Development

Rasheed

Zafar

Shehryar

et al. 2021

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This resistant action cuts development costs and results in higher-quality and reliable software development [13]. Defects must be operated at all steps to preserve customer integrity [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software Process Improvement Based on Defect Prevention Using Capability and Testing Model Integration in Extreme Programming

Rahman¹,

Rahman²,

Al-Mustanjid³

et al. 2020

Cyber Security and Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, Software Process Improvement popularly known as SPI has been able to receive an immense concern in the continuous process to purify software quality. Several Agile methodologies previously have worked with Extreme programming (XP). Before improving the process, defect prevention (DP) is inevitable. In addition, DP largely depends on defect detection either found earlier in the design and implementation stages or held in the testing phases. However, testing maturity model integration (TMMI) has a crucial aspect in DP as well as process improvement of the software. In particular, when software gets validated by being tested and fixed the defects up, it achieves the maximum capability maturity model integration (CMMI) aiming the process improvement. Here, the article has proposed an improved defect detection and prevention model to enhance the software process following the approach of XP. Besides, as a unique contribution, we have united the capability and testing model integration to ensure better SPI.

show abstract

“…Defect management process will also help the agile team to cater the major risks of software projects [9]. Ali et al [10] report a study to apply defect management with respect to the software industry of Pakistan. A questionnaire is used as a research tool to conclude the results.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Quality of Proposed Agile XScrum Model

Qureshi¹

2017

IJMECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The software companies are practicing XP and Scrum models from last several years. XP lacks in management practices whereas Scrum is weak in engineering practices. Due to continually promising need of agile development, this research tackles the problems of XP and Scrum by integrating them to enrich the strengths of XP and Scrum and suppress their limitations. The previous attempts provide little effective empirical evidence regarding the integration of XP and Scrum. Therefore, there is a pressing need to provide empirical evidence for the integration of XP and Scrum to show its usefulness developing the software projects. The same is accomplished by proposing XScrum model. Another goal of this paper is to analyze the quality of proposed XScrum with existing XP and Scrum. The proposed XScrum is validated by performing three case studies for three industrial projects and the results are described in the paper. The results are presented using quantitative and qualitative data. The results provide empirical evidence that there is a significant improvement in quality of proposed XScrum as compared to the existing XP and Scrum.

show abstract

Defect Management in Agile Software Development

Cited by 12 publications

References 5 publications

Requirement Engineering Challenges in Agile Software Development

Requirement Engineering Challenges in Agile Software Development

Software Process Improvement Based on Defect Prevention Using Capability and Testing Model Integration in Extreme Programming

Evaluating the Quality of Proposed Agile XScrum Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About