2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3193775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect Identification of Adhesive Structure Based on DCGAN and YOLOv5

Abstract: To overcome the problem of small defect samples and the imbalanced distribution of defect categories during adhesive structure defect detection, a defect identification approach based on DCGAN and YOLOv5 is proposed. The above problems are solved by fine-tuning the structure and the loss function of the DCGAN, generating high-quality defect images, and expanding the dataset of adhesive structure defects. Generally, using the EIOU loss function in the YOLOv5 network allows the network to converge faster during … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the best algorithm of the YOLO family, YOLv5 has a slow detection speed, and there are problems involving the false detection of leaks in large objects, which cannot be detected well. Therefore, research scholars have started to study the improved YOLOv5 algorithm, and the main improvement methods are Transformers [20][21][22][23], attention mechanisms [24][25][26][27], etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the best algorithm of the YOLO family, YOLv5 has a slow detection speed, and there are problems involving the false detection of leaks in large objects, which cannot be detected well. Therefore, research scholars have started to study the improved YOLOv5 algorithm, and the main improvement methods are Transformers [20][21][22][23], attention mechanisms [24][25][26][27], etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the CBAM attention mechanism to handle dense object scenarios. According to the experimental results, the detection performance of TPH-YOLO v5 improved by about 7% compared to the original performance of YOLO v5 [29] to improve YOLO v5 for highquality defect detection. The authors refined the loss function and the DCGAN structure to generate high-quality defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experimental results reveal a noteworthy enhancement in the detection performance of TPH-YOLO v5, showing approximately a 7% improvement compared to the original performance of YOLO v5. In a separate study, [33] enhances YOLO v5 for high-quality defect detection. This involves refining both the loss function and the DCGAN structure to generate defects of superior quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%