1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.79.2273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect Donor and Acceptor in GaN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
223
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
19
223
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16,18 For the conditions here, the correction was about 20%, and was included in the N T0 data shown in Fig. 3 The conclusion that both ED1 and ED2 have a thermal energy of about 0.06 eV is significant, because it resolves the major discrepancy with the Hall-effect experiment, 7 which also found an energy of 0.06 eV. Earlier DLTS analyses 8,10,12,17 had found much higher energies, 0.14-0.20 eV; however, in these cases, a single peak was assumed, Arrhenius plots were used to determine the energies, and the E contribution to the energies was not considered.…”
Section: ͑2͒mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…16,18 For the conditions here, the correction was about 20%, and was included in the N T0 data shown in Fig. 3 The conclusion that both ED1 and ED2 have a thermal energy of about 0.06 eV is significant, because it resolves the major discrepancy with the Hall-effect experiment, 7 which also found an energy of 0.06 eV. Earlier DLTS analyses 8,10,12,17 had found much higher energies, 0.14-0.20 eV; however, in these cases, a single peak was assumed, Arrhenius plots were used to determine the energies, and the E contribution to the energies was not considered.…”
Section: ͑2͒mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…5 Recently, a strong effort by several groups has been devoted to the study of irradiation-induced defects in GaN and related compounds. [6][7][8][9][10] Most of the results are still not fully understood, but some useful conclusions have already emerged. As an example, for 30 years the N vacancy V N has been considered to be the dominant donor in GaN, 11 but it has just recently been shown that this assumption is not true, 7 at least for the best, present-day material.…”
Section: On the Main Irradiation-induced Defect In Ganmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10 Although there is a significant difference in the activation energy for the electron-irradiation-induced Hall donor center ͑0.07 eV͒ and the DLTS center ͑0.18 eV͒, we still believe that the DLTS center, trap E, might be related to the N vacancy, since an activation energy for the capture cross section could be involved in the apparent DLTS activation energy of 0.18 eV. Moreover, both centers have similar production rates and annealing behavior.…”
Section: T Mmentioning
confidence: 95%