2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-015-0743-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defeating face de-identification methods based on DCT-block scrambling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reversible adaptive filters include scrambling [5], [10]- [12], [25]- [27], warping [28] and morphing [29]. While reversible adaptive filters are robust against a parrot attack, their protected faces can be compromised by spatial-domain [30], [31] or frequencydomain attacks [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reversible adaptive filters include scrambling [5], [10]- [12], [25]- [27], warping [28] and morphing [29]. While reversible adaptive filters are robust against a parrot attack, their protected faces can be compromised by spatial-domain [30], [31] or frequencydomain attacks [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008; Ruchaud and Dugelay, 2017;Sohn et al, 2011), warping (Korshunov and Ebrahimi, 2013b) and morphing (Korshunov and Ebrahimi, 2013a). While reversible adaptive filters are robust against a parrot attack, their protected faces can be compromised by spatial-domain (Jiang et al, 2016a,b) or frequency-domain attacks (Rashwan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%