1998
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/11.2.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Default Risk Cannot Explain the Muni Puzzle: Evidence from Municipal Bonds that are Secured by U.S. Treasury Obligations

Abstract: Fama (1977) and Miller (1977) predict that one minus the corporate tax rate will equate aftertax yields from comparable taxable and taxexempt bonds. Empirical evidence shows that long-term tax-exempt yields are higher than theory predicts. Two popular explanations for this empirical puzzle are that, relative to taxable bonds, municipal bonds bear more default risk and include costly call options. I study U.S. government secured municipal bond yields which are effectively default-free and noncallable. These mun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two aspects of Green's analysis lend credibility to the approach I use to infer J : 1) Green notes that it p is better to use short-term yields to infer J because complicating factors, such as the deductibility of investment p interest expense at the personal level, are more pronounced for longer maturities, and 2) Green estimates implicit tax rates within subperiods corresponding to different tax regimes. Chalmers (1998) and others show that the implicit personal tax rate is lower if inferred from long-maturity munis and taxables, implying a smaller personal tax penalty than I estimate. See Mankiw and Poterba (1996) for a discussion about alternative approaches to inferring J ; I use the "traditional model" because it is the most widely used [e.g., Scholes and Wolfson (1992)].…”
Section: Tax Variablesmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Two aspects of Green's analysis lend credibility to the approach I use to infer J : 1) Green notes that it p is better to use short-term yields to infer J because complicating factors, such as the deductibility of investment p interest expense at the personal level, are more pronounced for longer maturities, and 2) Green estimates implicit tax rates within subperiods corresponding to different tax regimes. Chalmers (1998) and others show that the implicit personal tax rate is lower if inferred from long-maturity munis and taxables, implying a smaller personal tax penalty than I estimate. See Mankiw and Poterba (1996) for a discussion about alternative approaches to inferring J ; I use the "traditional model" because it is the most widely used [e.g., Scholes and Wolfson (1992)].…”
Section: Tax Variablesmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…relative to taxable yields, that is the term structure is generally steeper for municipal bonds than for Treasuries (see Green, 1993;Chalmers, 1998). In Table 4, we report a breakdown of the various implied BAB yields by maturity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the expenditure functions recorded by the census only exist at the federal level and have been excluded from the database otherwise. Other codes exist in the newest census It may seem like an odd choice to report state and local government securities twice given the explicit division between governmental and non-governmental securities in the data, but given that defaults by state and local governments are more likely than federal defaults ( [25] and many others) including state and local government bonds with non-federal securities is reasonable. For situations where this combination is unwanted state and local government securities can be subtracted out of the non-governmental securities variable.…”
Section: Categories Of Financial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%