2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Default prior distributions from quasi- and quasi-profile likelihoods

Abstract: In some problems of practical interest, a standard Bayesian analysis can be difficult to perform. This is true, for example, when the class of sampling parametric models is unknown or if robustness with respect to data or to model misspecifications is required. These situations can be usefully handled by using a posterior distribution for the parameter of interest which is based on a pseudo-likelihood function derived from estimating equations, i.e. on a quasi-likelihood, and on a suitable prior distribution. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory and use of estimating equations and that of the related quasi-and quasiprofile likelihood functions have received a good deal of attention in recent years; see, among others, Liang and Zeger (1995); Barndorff-Nielsen (1995); Desmond (1997); Heyde (1997); Adimari and Ventura (2002); Severini (2002); Wang and Hanfelt (2003); Jørgensen and Knudsen (2004); Bellio et al (2008). In addition, Ventura et al (2010); Lin (2006); Greco et al (2008) discuss the use of QL functions in the Bayesian setting.…”
Section: Mcmc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory and use of estimating equations and that of the related quasi-and quasiprofile likelihood functions have received a good deal of attention in recent years; see, among others, Liang and Zeger (1995); Barndorff-Nielsen (1995); Desmond (1997); Heyde (1997); Adimari and Ventura (2002); Severini (2002); Wang and Hanfelt (2003); Jørgensen and Knudsen (2004); Bellio et al (2008). In addition, Ventura et al (2010); Lin (2006); Greco et al (2008) discuss the use of QL functions in the Bayesian setting.…”
Section: Mcmc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a given prior π ( R ) for the correlations ρ i , j , the (pseudo‐)posterior takes the form π ( R | data) ∝ π ( R ) L ( R ) for R ∈ Ω , with the likelihood L ( R ) as in or . When L ( R ) is a pseudo‐likelihood, the posterior is called pseudo‐posterior (Pauli et al , ; Ventura et al , ), but it is a proper distribution that we can work with. The joint posterior distribution of the ρ i , j 's can be summarized in various ways, leading to point estimates, credibility intervals and regions.…”
Section: A Bayesian Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Bayesian robustness with respect to model misspecification have attracted considerable attention. For instance, Lazar (2003), Greco et al (2008), Ventura et al (2010) and Agostinelli and Greco (2013) discuss approaches based on robust pseudo-likelihood functions, such as the empirical likelihood, as replacement of the genuine likelihood in Bayes' formula. Lewis et al (2014) discuss an approach for building posterior distributions from robust M-estimators using constrained Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%