2006
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepSAGE—digital transcriptomics with high sensitivity, simple experimental protocol and multiplexing of samples

Abstract: Digital transcriptomics with pyrophosphatase based ultra-high throughput DNA sequencing of di-tags provides high sensitivity and cost-effective gene expression profiling. Sample preparation and handling are greatly simplified compared to Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE). We compare DeepSAGE and LongSAGE data and demonstrate greater power of detection and multiplexing of samples derived from potato. The transcript analysis revealed a great abundance of up-regulated potato transcripts associated with st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore these approaches are more efficient at detecting very rare transcripts and variation in highly expressed genes (because of higher resolution) and the analyses therefore have a greater dynamic range. Another advantage of digital transcriptomics over microarrays is the ability to detect expression levels in previously unknown genes (Nielsen et al, 2006). In a recent study, there was a very high correlation between the number of 454 reads mapping to a gene and microarray determined gene expression of it (Kristiansson et al, 2009), thus validating the RNA-Seq methodology for non-model organisms.…”
Section: Gene Expression Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore these approaches are more efficient at detecting very rare transcripts and variation in highly expressed genes (because of higher resolution) and the analyses therefore have a greater dynamic range. Another advantage of digital transcriptomics over microarrays is the ability to detect expression levels in previously unknown genes (Nielsen et al, 2006). In a recent study, there was a very high correlation between the number of 454 reads mapping to a gene and microarray determined gene expression of it (Kristiansson et al, 2009), thus validating the RNA-Seq methodology for non-model organisms.…”
Section: Gene Expression Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next generation sequencing in non-model organisms R Ekblom and J Galindo example deep serial analysis of gene expression (see Glossary) (Nielsen et al, 2006) always outputs the same sequence tag for a given transcript, facilitating data analysis. The utility of this approach for surveying gene expression in a non-model organism was recently verified in a study of drought stress responses of chick pea (Cicer arietinum) roots (Molina et al, 2008).…”
Section: Gene Expression Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the differences in transcriptomic responses to excess uracil between wild type and the pyrG89 mutant, we examined genome-wide transcriptional responses to excess uracil by digital gene expression (DGE) profiling [21]. Briefly, the spores of A. nidulans wild type or the pyrG89 mutant were inoculated into 150-ml flasks containing 75 mL liquid medium (MMV+1×uridine+4×uracil and MMV+1× uridine+1×uracil) and incubated at 28°C with shaking at 180 r min 1 for 30 h. Then RNA was extracted from three replicate samples for the DGE profiling assay.…”
Section: Analysis Of Transcriptomic Responses To Excess Uracil By Digmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such technologies offer up to two orders of magnitude increase in per base cost efficiency compared to capillary sequencing (von Bubnoff 2008). These platforms have made feasible previously cost-prohibitive projects such as genome resequencing (Green et al 2006;Bentley et al 2008;Ley et al 2008;Wang et al 2008b) and deep transcriptome and noncoding RNA sequencing (Nielsen et al 2006;Weber et al 2007;Marioni et al 2008;Morin et al 2008;Rosenkranz et al 2008), as well as genome-wide protein bindingsite surveys (ChIP-seq) (Jothi et al 2008;Wederell et al 2008). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%