2018
DOI: 10.1101/387621
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

deepMc: deep Matrix Completion for imputation of single cell RNA-seq data

Abstract: Single cell RNA-seq has fueled discovery and innovation in medicine over the past few years and is useful for studying cellular responses at individual cell resolution. But, due to paucity of starting RNA, the data acquired is highly sparse. To address this, We propose a deep matrix factorization based method, deepMc, to impute missing values in gene-expression data. For the deep architecture of our approach, We draw our motivation from great success of deep learning in solving various Machine learning problem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the DeepImpute method, Mongia et al proposed an attribution technology based on deep matrix factorization deepMc 33 . The deepMc method does not assume any gene expression distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the DeepImpute method, Mongia et al proposed an attribution technology based on deep matrix factorization deepMc 33 . The deepMc method does not assume any gene expression distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mongia et al proved that the deepMc method is better than the DeepImpute attribution technology under most experimental conditions (Figure 4). We all know that one of the most important applications of scRNA‐seq is to cluster scRNA‐seq data to discover different cell types from heterogeneous cell populations, so the two can be compared from the clustering accuracy obtained after imputation The advantages of the algorithm, as shown in Figure 4A, the Adjusted Rand Index value obtained after applying k‐means clustering after various interpolation techniques, deepMc has a much higher accuracy than DeepImpute 33 . Second, they also compared the two methods by evaluating the accuracy of DE analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McImpute applies soft thresholding iteratively on singular values without making any assumption about the expression data distribution. Deep learning‐based pipeline, deepMc, imputes missing values in gene expression data using a deep matrix factorization‐based method (Mongia, Sengupta, & Majumdar, 2020). SAVER is a model‐based method that models UMI counts using a negative binomial distribution (Huang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Data Analytics Best‐practices In Single‐cell Transcriptomics: a Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setting of the size of the latent factors U and V allow to impose rank constraints on their product. Motivated by the success of deep learning in numerous fields [64,67,61,53], the shallow (two factor) models have been extended to deeper versions. The general factorization problem when the matrix is completely observed have been proposed in [41,71].…”
Section: Matrix Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general factorization problem when the matrix is completely observed have been proposed in [41,71]. The solution to matrix completion via deep factorization has been proposed very recently, in [53]. This can be formally expressed as follows, in the 2-layers case:…”
Section: Matrix Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%