2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0774-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deeply virtual Compton scattering off the neutron

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in a clear separation of up and down quark contributions to the leading CFF H , as shown on right panels of Figure 5. Similar separation was attempted by the authors of [18], using local fitting in each kinematic bin, but extracted flavored CFFs were not so cleanly separated in this work. This illustrates both the usefulness of the neural network approach and power of dispersion relations.…”
Section: Separation Of Quark Flavorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This resulted in a clear separation of up and down quark contributions to the leading CFF H , as shown on right panels of Figure 5. Similar separation was attempted by the authors of [18], using local fitting in each kinematic bin, but extracted flavored CFFs were not so cleanly separated in this work. This illustrates both the usefulness of the neural network approach and power of dispersion relations.…”
Section: Separation Of Quark Flavorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Then, we added the data from the recent measurement of DVCS off neutron [18], and attempted to fit the same neural network model, but now with separate parametrization of up and down quark parts, using the isospin symmetry to relate neutron GPDs to proton ones. This resulted in a clear separation of up and down quark contributions to the leading CFF H , as shown on right panels of Figure 5.…”
Section: Separation Of Quark Flavorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of single CFFs from experimental data essentially falls into two groups: global [23,24] and local [25,26,27] fits. On the one hand, the former involve the choice of a GPD parameterization and offer a coherent treatment of the measured and unexplored phase-spaces.…”
Section: Compton Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As first demonstrated in [20] and described theoretically in [29], the measurement of the DVCS cross section at two or more values of the ep center-of-mass energy √ s provides statistically significant separation of the real and imaginary parts of the BH-DVCS interference term as well as the DVCS 2 contribution in the cross sections for polarized electrons. A new analysis [30] of all previous JLab DVCS data followed a similar procedure, and obtained flavor-separated Compton Form Factors, after inclusion of our recent neutron DVCS data [31]. In the present analysis, realistic error bands on the chiral-even CFFs are obtained by explicit inclusion of higher-order terms (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%