2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.016007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deeply inelastic scattering structure functions on a hybrid quantum computer

Abstract: We outline a strategy to compute deeply inelastic scattering structure functions using a hybrid quantum computer. Our approach takes advantage of the representation of the fermion determinant in the QCD path integral as a quantum mechanical path integral over 0 þ 1-dimensional fermionic and bosonic worldlines. The proper time evolution of these worldlines can be determined on a quantum computer. While extremely challenging in general, the problem simplifies in the Regge limit of QCD, where the interaction of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the non-Abelian case, it may be helpful to generate the particle color factor, and take care of the path ordering, by adding suitable auxiliary fields, in the same way as Grassmann variables take care of the spin factor and path ordering in (1.19) -see, for example, [47][48][49][50]. Further applications to QCD-related topics can be found in references [51][52][53].…”
Section: Jhep08(2020)018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the non-Abelian case, it may be helpful to generate the particle color factor, and take care of the path ordering, by adding suitable auxiliary fields, in the same way as Grassmann variables take care of the spin factor and path ordering in (1.19) -see, for example, [47][48][49][50]. Further applications to QCD-related topics can be found in references [51][52][53].…”
Section: Jhep08(2020)018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the importance of 'simpler' (2+1) dimensional gauge theories in the context of, e.g., topological entanglement for universal topological quantum computation [65,79], and condensed matter physics [80,81], the Entanglement structure of Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories, such as QCD, may be crucial to make sense of thermalization in high energy and nuclear physics, where it is largely unexplored. Examples are the apparent quick thermalization and hydrodynamization of the Quark-Gluon-Plasma in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions [14] or the structure of QCD bound states in deeply inelastic scattering experiments [82][83][84].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the vast majority of experimental results was achieved for abelian lattice gauge theories [28, 30-32, 45, 61, 64-67]. Although strong efforts have been devoted to proposals for quantum simulating non-abelian gauge theories [43,[68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80], only a few proofs of principle for non-abelian theories have been achieved in the laboratory by exploiting the gauge constraint to limit the system to the gauge Hilbert space [77,[81][82][83][84][85]. Other implementation strategies for non-abelian gauge theories still remain unexplored within laboratory experiments, and it still remains a challenge to achieve scaling in system size similar to what has been demonstrated for abelian gauge theories, while keeping the reliability of the quantum simulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%