Robotics and Applications 2011
DOI: 10.2316/p.2011.740-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deeper Understanding on Solution Ambiguity by Homography Decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if I = 10, i.e. 10 inlier and 5 outlier views are given, the outlier percentage is calculated as 1− 10 2 / 15 2 ≈ 0.57. In the figures, the horizontal axis reports the outlier ratio and the vertical one shows the mean angular error of the results.…”
Section: A Synthesized Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, if I = 10, i.e. 10 inlier and 5 outlier views are given, the outlier percentage is calculated as 1− 10 2 / 15 2 ≈ 0.57. In the figures, the horizontal axis reports the outlier ratio and the vertical one shows the mean angular error of the results.…”
Section: A Synthesized Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the decomposition itself is ambiguous as it was shown by several studies, e.g. in [10], and homography estimation cannot be done for each point correspondence independently. Thus, in general, these methods are applied to corresponding image regions supposing that the underlying surface patch is planar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the decomposition itself is ambiguous as it was shown by several studies, e.g. in [56], and homography estimation cannot be done for each point correspondence independently. Thus, in general, these methods are applied to superpixel correspondences, i.e.…”
Section: Optimal Multi-view Surface Normal Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%