2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.12.148296
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing

Abstract: Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps are among the most valuable sources of information for protein structure modeling. However, due to the loss of contrast at high frequencies, they generally need to be post-processed before modeling in order to improve their interpretability. To that end, approaches based on B-factor correction are the most popular choices, yet they suffer from some limitations such as the fact that the correction is applied globally, ignoring the presence of heterogeneity in the map loca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
218
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic elements of the workflow combine quite classic cryo-EM algorithms with recent improvements in particle picking ( Sanchez-Garcia et al, 2020b , 2018 ; Wagner et al, 2019 ) and key ideas of meta classifiers, which integrate multiple classifiers by a “consensus” approach ( Sorzano et al, 2000 ), finalizing with a totally new approach to map post-processing based on deep learning that we term “Deep cryo EM Map Enhancer” ( Sanchez-Garcia et al, 2020a ), that complements our previous proposal on local deblurring ( Ramírez-Aportela et al, 2020b ). Naturally, map and map-model quality analysis are performed with a variety of tools ( Pintilie et al, 2020 ; Ramírez-Aportela et al, 2020a ; Vilas et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic elements of the workflow combine quite classic cryo-EM algorithms with recent improvements in particle picking ( Sanchez-Garcia et al, 2020b , 2018 ; Wagner et al, 2019 ) and key ideas of meta classifiers, which integrate multiple classifiers by a “consensus” approach ( Sorzano et al, 2000 ), finalizing with a totally new approach to map post-processing based on deep learning that we term “Deep cryo EM Map Enhancer” ( Sanchez-Garcia et al, 2020a ), that complements our previous proposal on local deblurring ( Ramírez-Aportela et al, 2020b ). Naturally, map and map-model quality analysis are performed with a variety of tools ( Pintilie et al, 2020 ; Ramírez-Aportela et al, 2020a ; Vilas et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the approaches is our already introduced LocalDeblur sharpening method (Ramírez-Aportela et al, 2020b). The second approach is a totally new method based on deep learning (Sanchez-Garcia et al, 2020a). Concentrating on the latter method, DeepEMhancer, it relies on a common approach in modern pattern recognition, where a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained on a known data set, comprised of pairs of data points and targets, with the aim of predicting the targets for new unseen data points.…”
Section: Volume Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic elements of the workflow combine classic cryo-EM algorithms with recent improvements in particle picking (Sanchez-Garcia et al, 2018;Sanchez-Garcia, Segura et al, 2020;Wagner et al, 2019) and the key ideas of meta classifiers, which integrate multiple classifiers by a 'consensus' approach (Sorzano et al, 2020), and finish with a totally new approach to map post-processing based on deep learning that we term Deep cryo-EM Map Enhancer (DeepEMhancer; Sanchez-Garcia, Gomez-Blanco et al, 2020), which complements our previous proposal on local deblurring (Ramírez-Aportela, Vilas et al, 2020). Naturally, map and map-model quality analyses are performed using a variety of tools (Pintilie et al, 2020;Vilas et al, 2020).…”
Section: Image-processing Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This matching approach provided equal data sets for a total of 1,657,372 particleorientations per reconstruction. DeepEMhancer was used to improve local sharpening of maps during post-processing (33). Difference maps were calculated by subtracting the Fab-occupied and unoccupied maps in EMAN (34).…”
Section: Asymmetric Reconstructions After 3d Classification Into 6 Smentioning
confidence: 99%