2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.105945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepBend: An interpretable model of DNA bendability

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both shuffling-type experiments indicate that dinucleotide composition plays an important role in the intrinsic cyclizability of a given DNA sequence. This agrees with previous studies that linked dinucleotides as key determinants of certain DNA mechanical properties (45,46) and the study by Khan et al (30), which made similar observations. When comparing the cyclizability signal to the distribution of all 16 dinucleotides at each position normalized to their random expectation, we found that their relative frequencies change markedly around the TSS and that TA frequency, in particular, correlated strongly with the cyclizability pattern found in Arabidopsis (Figure 5).…”
Section: Autocorrelation Of Cyclizability Shows No Large-scale Patternssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both shuffling-type experiments indicate that dinucleotide composition plays an important role in the intrinsic cyclizability of a given DNA sequence. This agrees with previous studies that linked dinucleotides as key determinants of certain DNA mechanical properties (45,46) and the study by Khan et al (30), which made similar observations. When comparing the cyclizability signal to the distribution of all 16 dinucleotides at each position normalized to their random expectation, we found that their relative frequencies change markedly around the TSS and that TA frequency, in particular, correlated strongly with the cyclizability pattern found in Arabidopsis (Figure 5).…”
Section: Autocorrelation Of Cyclizability Shows No Large-scale Patternssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies concluded that base composition is not a good indicator of DNA rigidity, except for mono-base or two-base repeats (44). This was confirmed by the two existing computational models (29,30) as well as by our model CycPred. Randomly shuffling random sequences (each base assumed with equal frequency (25%), shuffling at the level of individual bases) leads to a large variance of predictions.…”
Section: Autocorrelation Of Cyclizability Shows No Large-scale Patternssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations