2017
DOI: 10.1101/172767
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepATAC: A deep-learning method to predict regulatory factor binding activity from ATAC-seq signals

Abstract: Determining the binding locations of regulatory factors, such as transcription factors and histone modifications, is essential to both basic biology research and many clinical applications. Obtaining such genome-wide location maps directly is often invasive and resource-intensive, so it is common to impute binding locations from DNA sequence or measures of chromatin accessibility. We introduce DeepATAC, a deep-learning approach for imputing binding locations that uses both DNA sequence and chromatin accessibil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently been applied to predict transcription factor (TF) binding motifs from genomic sequences [1][2][3][4]. Despite the promise that CNNs bring in replacing methods that rely on k-mers and position weight matrices (PWMs) [5,6], there remains a large gap in our understanding of why CNNs perform well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently been applied to predict transcription factor (TF) binding motifs from genomic sequences [1][2][3][4]. Despite the promise that CNNs bring in replacing methods that rely on k-mers and position weight matrices (PWMs) [5,6], there remains a large gap in our understanding of why CNNs perform well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently been applied to predict transcription factor (TF) binding motifs from genomic sequences (Zhou and Troyanskaya, 2015;Quang and Xie, 2016;Kelley et al , 2016;Hiranuma et al , 2017). Despite the promise that CNNs bring in replacing methods that rely on k -mers and position weight matrices (PWMs) (Ghandi et al , 2016;Foat et al , 2006), there remains a large gap in our understanding of why CNNs perform well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated improved performance in many prediction tasks in computational biology (Zhou & Troyanskaya, 2015;Alipanahi et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2016;Eraslan et al, 2019;Hiranuma et al, 2017;Angermueller et al, 2017;Kelley et al, 2016). Despite their promise, the main drawback of DNNs is the difficulty in understanding why they make any given prediction.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%