2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07246-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep transfer learning techniques with hybrid optimization in early prediction and diagnosis of different types of oral cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…sec2 Developments in the artificial intelligence has greatly helped the advancements in automating the cancer detection. Bansal et al [19] demonstrated the classification of malignant and non-malignant histopathological images using the deep transfer learning techniques such as ResNet50, MobileNetV2, VGG19, VGG16, and DenseNet along with the optimization technique. This has significantly increased the detection accuracy and reduces the error.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sec2 Developments in the artificial intelligence has greatly helped the advancements in automating the cancer detection. Bansal et al [19] demonstrated the classification of malignant and non-malignant histopathological images using the deep transfer learning techniques such as ResNet50, MobileNetV2, VGG19, VGG16, and DenseNet along with the optimization technique. This has significantly increased the detection accuracy and reduces the error.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Bansal et al 9 proposed deep hybrid transfer learning techniques for classifying and predicting oral cancer. They employed five pre-trained models and applied them to real-time and histopathological datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Bansal et al 9 . proposed deep hybrid transfer learning techniques for classifying and predicting oral cancer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], the authors analyzed oral mucosa disorders and their diagnosis through digital imaging and compared TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) staging with a neural network for 75 patients, achieving high accuracy: 100% for T1, 85.19% for T2, 84.21% for T3, and 94.12% for T4. In [23], a study utilized deep transfer learning algorithms, like ResNet50, MobileNetV2, VGG19, VGG16, and DenseNet, on oral cancer images from histopathologic and real-time datasets. The most effective results were obtained with DenseNet using hybrid optimization techniques, achieving accuracies of 92.41% for real-time, 95.41% for oral cancer, and 92.41% for non-cancerous histopathologic images.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%