2022
DOI: 10.15622/ia.21.5.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Transfer Learning of Satellite Imagery for Land Use and Land Cover Classification

Abstract: Deep learning has been instrumental in solving difficult problems by automatically learning, from sample data, the rules (algorithms) that map an input to its respective output. Purpose: Perform land use landcover (LULC) classification using the training data of satellite imagery for Moscow region and compare the accuracy attained from different models. Methods: The accuracy attained for LULC classification using deep learning algorithm and satellite imagery data is dependent on both the model and the training… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Das et al, 2022). Generally, ResNet50 is considered superior to VGG16 in terms of accuracy, but VGG16's simpler architecture and easier implementation make it a better choice with a smaller or medium-sized dataset (Pallavi et al, 2022;Yifter et al, 2022). While DL models require larger datasets to avoid over tting, simpler ML models can perform well with smaller datasets due to their generalization ability with lesser parameters.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Ne-tuned ML and Dl Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Das et al, 2022). Generally, ResNet50 is considered superior to VGG16 in terms of accuracy, but VGG16's simpler architecture and easier implementation make it a better choice with a smaller or medium-sized dataset (Pallavi et al, 2022;Yifter et al, 2022). While DL models require larger datasets to avoid over tting, simpler ML models can perform well with smaller datasets due to their generalization ability with lesser parameters.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Ne-tuned ML and Dl Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%