“…with ∀Ψ, Ψ h x ∈ V H n , then, multiplying both sides of ( 21) on the left and on the right by diag{I, I, I, PZ −1 , PS −1 } and its transpose, respectively, and using the inequalities −PZ −1 P ≤ −2ρ 1 P + ρ 2 1 Z, −PS −1 P ≤ −2ρ 2 P + ρ 2 2 S, we can deduce that ( 12) is a sufficient condition for (21). We finish the proof.…”